期刊文献+

碳绩效对财务绩效的影响——基于新三维框架下调节因素的探讨 被引量:1

Effect of Carbon Performance on Financial Performance under a New Three-dimensional Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以CDP报告中世界500强企业作为样本,考察碳绩效对财务绩效的影响,并建立新三维概念框架,将碳信息披露、利益相关者权力、高诉讼风险及碳密集程度作为调节变量,对碳绩效与财务绩效的关系进一步研究.结果表明:碳绩效正向影响财务绩效,碳信息披露调节作用不成立;利益相关者权力和碳密集程度负向调节;高诉讼风险正向调节.由此说明,企业能通过低碳减排实现社会与经济效益,当诉讼风险低、战略态势积极时,企业碳行为能更好地提升业绩. Taking the Fortune 500 companies in the CDP report as samples,this paper investigates the impact of carbon performance on financial performance,and introduces a new three-dimensional conceptual framework that takes carbon information disclosure,stakeholder power,high litigation risk and carbon intensity as moderating variables.The results show that carbon performance has a positive impact on financial performance,and carbon information disclosure has no moderating role.Stakeholder power and carbon intensity have a negative moderating role,while high litigation risk has a positive moderating role.The results indicate that through low-carbon emission reductions,enterprises can achieve social and economic benefits.When the litigation risks are low and strategic trends are active,corporate carbon behavior can better improve performance.
作者 刘天晴 徐凌 LIU Tianqing;XU Ling(School of Economics and Management,China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao 266580,Shandong China)
出处 《河南科学》 2021年第7期1173-1181,共9页 Henan Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(11401585) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(14YJC910004) 青岛市社会科学规划研究项目(QDSKL1901039)。
关键词 碳绩效 财务绩效 新三维概念框架 低碳经济 carbon performance financial performance new three-dimensional conceptual framework low-carbon economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献63

  • 1沈洪涛,金婷婷.我国上市公司社会责任信息披露的现状分析[J].审计与经济研究,2006,21(3):84-87. 被引量:145
  • 2Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., T. E. Christensen, and K. E. Hughes. 2004. The Relations among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 (5 -6) : 447 ~471.
  • 3Botosan, C. A., and M. A. Plumlee. 2005. Assessing Alternative Proxies for the Expected Risk Premium. The Ac- counting Review, 80 ( 1 ) : 21 ~ 53.
  • 4Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the Relation between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: an Empirical Analy- sis. Accounting Organizations and Society, 33 ( 4 - 5 ) : 303 ~ 327.
  • 5Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari. 2011a. Does it Really Pay to Be Green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30 (2) : 122 ~ 144.
  • 6Clarkson, P. M., M. B. Overell, and L. Chapple. 2011b. Environmental Reporting and its Relation to Corporate Environmental Performance. Abacus, 47 (1) : 27 - 60.
  • 7Core, J. E. 2001. AReview of the Empirical Disclosure Literature: Discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1 -3) : 441 ~456.
  • 8Dhaliwal, D. S. , O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2011. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: the Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Repor- ting. The Accounting Review, 86 ( 1 ) : 59 - 100.
  • 9Easton, P. D. 2004. PE Ratios, PEG Ratios, and Estima- ting the Implied Expected Rate of Return on Equity Capital. The Accounting Review, 79 ( 1 ) : 73 - 95.
  • 10Francis, J. , D. Nanda, and P. Olsson. 2008. Voluntary Disclosure, Earnings Quality, and Cost of Capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 46 ( 1 ) : 53 - 99.

共引文献271

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部