期刊文献+

英国大学评价新动向:基于“知识交流框架”的分析 被引量:4

New Trends of University Evaluation in UK:Based on the Knowledge Exchange Framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 大学评价是推动当代大学改革的重要动力。为评估大学服务经济社会发展能力,英国政府制定并实施了"知识交流框架"。从评估主体、评估维度、评估原则、评估方法和评估结果方面来看,"知识交流框架"呈现出多元性、聚焦性、均衡性、整体性、导向性等特征。"知识交流框架"是社会对大学问责的重要形式,对促进知识生产与转化具有积极影响,但其强调市场逻辑,也隐藏着功利主义倾向。我国高等教育评价机制改革应吸取其合理内核,注重绩效评价,加强整体性、多元性、长效性评价。 The evaluation is an important driving force for the contemporary reform of u-niversities.In order to make the assessment on the university ability to serve the economic and social development,the UK government started to develop and implement knowledge exchange framework(KEF).From the perspective of evaluation,the KEF presents the characteristics of diversity,focusability,proportionality,integrality and orientation.The KEF is a significant form of social accountability,and has a positive impact on promoting knowledge production and transformation.However,its market logic has the tendency of utilitarianism.Then,the reform of China higher education evaluation mechanism should draw on the reasonable experiences,stress on the performance evaluation and strengthen the assessment in a way of integrity,diversity and longevity.
作者 徐小洲 王劫丹 XU Xiao-zhou;WANG Jie-dan(School of Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期91-98,共8页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 国家社会科学基金(教育学)重点课题(AGA200015)。
关键词 英国 大学评价 知识交流框架 United Kingdom university evaluation knowledge exchange framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献115

  • 1姜添辉.台湾高等教育的发展与不均等问题[J].清华大学教育研究,2009,30(3):49-58. 被引量:4
  • 2TOLOFARI S. New Public Management and Educa- tionEJ]. Policy Futures in Education, 2005,3 (1) : 75- 89.
  • 3FERLIE E, MUSSELIN C, ANDRESANI G. The Steering of Higher Education Systems: A Public Man- agement PerspectiveEJ. Higher Education, 2008, 56 (3) :325-348.
  • 4DEEM R,BREHONY K J. Management as Ideology:The Case of "New Managerialism in High- er Education[J]. Oxford Review of Education, 2005, 31(2) :217-235.
  • 5BLEIKLIE I. Justifying the Evaluative State..New Public Management Ideals in Higher EdueationJ]. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1998,2 : 87-100.
  • 6GIBBS P T. Trusting in the university:The Con- tribution of Temporality and Trust to a Praxis of Higher Learning[M]. Dordrecht BostonKluwer Ac- ademic Publishers, 2004.
  • 7TROW M. Managerialism and the Academic Profes- sion..The Case of England[J]. Higher Education Poli- cy,1994,7(2) 11-18.
  • 8DEEM R,JOHNSON R. Managerialism and Uni- versity Managers: Building New Academic Communi- ties or Disrupting Old Ones?[M]// MCNAY I. Higher Education and Its Communities. SRHE Open University Press, 2000 .. 65-84.
  • 9TEICHLER U. The Future of Higher Education and the Future of Higher Education Research[J]. Tertiary Education and Management,2003,9(3) :171-185.
  • 10DEEM R. Managing to Exclude? Manager-Academic and Staff Communities in Contemporary UK Universi- ties[-M//TIGHT M. Access and Exclusion,Boston: Elsevier Science, 2003 : 103-25.

共引文献41

同被引文献65

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部