期刊文献+

教学支架对超文本学习中元理解判断准确性和测验成绩的影响 被引量:1

The Influence of Teaching Scaffolding on Metacomprehension Judgment and Test Score in Hypertext Learning
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用2×3的混合实验设计,探讨教学支架对超文本学习中元理解判断准确性和测验成绩的影响。结果发现,超文本学习中提供教学支架显著提高了元理解判断的绝对准确性和相对准确性,显著提高了阅读测验成绩。这些结果表明教学支架是超文本阅读中提高学生元认知能力和学习效果的有效手段。
作者 谢继红 吴彦文 康诚 金桂春 XIE Jihong;WU Yanwen;KANG Cheng;JIN Guichun
出处 《教育研究与实验》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期87-91,共5页 Educational Research and Experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献51

  • 1张彤,赵翠霞,郑锡宁.基于认知理论的多媒体教学界面设计研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1502-1505. 被引量:30
  • 2沈大为,韩凯.FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):320-327. 被引量:9
  • 3[1]Dunlosky J, Nelson T O. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOLs) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 1992, 20: 373~380
  • 4[2]Shaw R J, Craik F I M. Age differences in performance on a cue recall task. Psychology and Aging, 1989, 4 (2): 131~135
  • 5[3]Carroll M, Nelson T O, Kirwan A. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 1997, 95: 239~253
  • 6[4]Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgment of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, 126: 349~370
  • 7[5]Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 1993, 100: 609~639
  • 8[6]Koriat A. Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, 124: 311~333
  • 9[7]Kelemen W L. Metamemory for related information is determined by the type of mnemonic cue. The Sciences and Engineering, 1999, 59 (7-B): 3726
  • 10[8]Schreiber T A. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cues recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26: 553~571

共引文献150

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部