摘要
内格里和哈特主要从劳动生产的角度去寻找抵抗帝国权力的力量,提出了"生命政治劳动",生命政治劳动是劳动与生命政治的接榫,主要以非物质劳动为"一般智力"的具体劳动形式,生命权力模式从中心化转变成去中心化,劳动对资本的从属从形式转向实际。数字劳动正是数字生命政治的实现形式,因为首先,数字劳动的生产性构成了数字生命政治的前摄基础;其次,数字劳动构序了数字生命政治的合理性权力基础;再次,数字生命时间的侵占形成了数字生命政治的权力机制。数字劳动扩展了剩余价值的内涵边界,形成了数字生命时间的剥夺,促成了思想无产阶级化,从而也加速了数字生命的赤裸化祛序,呈现出数字时代的治理术。
Negri and Hart are mainly from the perspective of labor production to look for resistance to the power of the imperial power, put forward the "Biopolitics Labour", which is labor and biopolitics of the tenon, mainly non-material labor as "general intelligence" of the specific form of labor, life mode shift from centralized to decentralized power, affiliate from form to actual labor for capital. Digital labor is the realization form of digital biopolitics, because first, the production of digital labor constitutes the proactive basis of digital biopolitics. Secondly, digital labor constructs the rational power base of digital biopolitics. Thirdly, the encroachment of digital life time forms the power mechanism of digital biopolitics. Digital labor expands the connotation boundary of surplus value, forms the deprivation of digital life time, promotes the proletarianization of thought, thus also accelerates the nakedness and disorder of digital life, and presents the governance of the digital age.
出处
《新闻界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第8期77-86,94,共11页
Journalism and Mass Communication
基金
上海市教育科学研究项目“人工智能时代高校意识形态的算法风险与精准防范”(C2021036)。
