期刊文献+

法官量刑的自由裁量权与量刑公正的实现——兼论人工智能在量刑中的定位与边界 被引量:6

Sentencing Discretion of Judges and Realization of Sentencing Justice——Also on the Positioning and Boundary of Artificial Intelligence in Sentencing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 量刑公正是形式正义与实质正义的有机统一,是刑罚的统一性与刑罚的个别性的有机统一。量刑公正的实现离不开法官自由裁量权的运用,应该避免恣意性裁量和机械性裁量两个极端。量刑思维的本质是事实判断与价值判断的有机统一,人工智能的算法逻辑决定了其不能独立完成量刑思维的全部过程,人工智能介入量刑的领域是有限度的,不能成为量刑活动的主导。实现人工智能与法官在量刑领域的深度融合,必须遵循人工智能的算法逻辑和量刑运行的基本规律。 Sentencing justice is the organic unity of formal justice and substantive justice,and also the organic unity of punishment unity and punishment individuality.The realization of sentencing justice is inseparable from the use of the judge’s discretion,and the two extremes of arbitrary discretion and mechanical discretion should be avoided.The essence of sentencing thinking is the organic unity of fact judgment and value judgment.The algorithm logic of artificial intelligence determines that it cannot complete the entire process of sentencing thinking independently,and since its involvement in sentencing is limited,it cannot become dominant in sentencing activities,To achieve the deep integration of artificial intelligence and judges in the field of sentencing,the algorithm logic of artificial intelligence and the basic rules of sentencing must be followed.
作者 黄春燕 Huang Chunyan(Law School,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan Shandong,250014)
出处 《山东师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期136-145,共10页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“家户制传统视阈下‘两户’制度存废问题研究”(20YJA820011)的阶段性成果。
关键词 量刑公正 自由裁量权 责任刑 预防刑 人工智能 sentencing justice discretion responsibility penalty preventive penalty artificial intelligence
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献162

共引文献512

同被引文献102

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部