期刊文献+

高中英语写作书面反馈现状调查与对策 被引量:3

A Study of the Current Situation of Written Feedback on Students'English Writing in Senior High Schools and Countermeasures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语写作是检测高中学生英语输出能力的重要手段,而书面反馈是学生英语写作教学中的重要环节,有效的教师反馈可以帮助学生提高英语写作能力。当前,高中英语写作书面反馈存在反馈内容有限、反馈的实施受学生人数影响、反馈的效果不明显以及反馈不恰当对学生的英语写作产生消极影响等问题。因此,应提升师生对书面反馈的重视程度、提高书面反馈的质量、多种反馈方式结合使用以及把握英语写作书面反馈的"度"等,以期帮助高中英语教师提高英语写作教学效果。 English writing is an important means to reflect the English output ability of high school students,and written feedback is an important part of students’ English writing teaching.Effective teacher feedback can help students improve their English writing ability.The analysis of the current situation of teachers’ written feedback on students’ English writing in senior high school reveals the problems of the limited content of written feedback,the negative influence of the large number of students,the poor effectiveness of written feedback,and the negative influence of improper written feedback on students’ writing.Some countermeasures are suggested for teachers,such as giving effective written feedback,improving the quality of written feedback,integrating different forms of written feedback,attaching more importance to written feedback,and correctly controlling the degree of written feedback.
作者 高丽妮 王珍 GAO Li-ni;WANG Zheng(School of Foreign Languages,Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou,Hebei 075000,China)
出处 《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第3期115-116,F0003,共3页 Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
关键词 高中英语 写作书面反馈 问题 对策 high school English teachers'written feedback problem strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献29

  • 1杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量:170
  • 2Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 227-257.
  • 3Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kind of er ror feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267-296.
  • 4Doughty, C. &J. Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 5Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 6Fathman, A. &E. Whalley. 1990. Teacher response to student writing, Focus on form versus content [A]. In B. Kroll (ed.). Second Language Writing, Research Insights for the Classroom [C]. Cambridge, CUP. 178-190.
  • 7Ferris, D. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 Writing classes: A response to Truscott [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-11.
  • 8Ferris, D. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 9Ferris, D. & B. Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be [J]? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161- 184.
  • 10Ferris, D., S. Chaney, K. Komura, B. Roberts&S. McKee. 2000. Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error [R]. In Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, Vancouver, March 14-18.

共引文献112

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部