期刊文献+

纳入政策预期的国际气候博弈

Analysis of International Climate Game Considering Policy Expectations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究首先对Baumol和Oates构建的公共外部性模型的假设条件进行修正,从而构建起更符合实际的国际气候治理的数理模型;求解该数理模型,本研究推导出同时实现全球帕累托最优和自身财政收支平衡下,国际环境协议必须遵循的唯一政策规则;最后,以此为基础,本研究进一步构建起纳入政策预期的国际气候博弈模型,并通过数理分析论证,揭示了:如果世界各国都只考虑自身利益最大化,纳入政策预期下的气候博弈的均衡结果,将无法实现全球气候治理的帕累托最优。 This paper firstly modifies the assumptions of the public externality model constructed by Baumol and Oates to build a mathematical model that is more realistic in international climate governance.Subsequently,by solving the mathematical model,this paper deduces the only policy rules that the International Environmental Agreement(IEA)must follow to achieve the optimal balance of global Pareto-optimality and its own financial balance.Finally,based on the above analysis,this paper further constructs an international climate game model that incorporates policy expectations.It reveals that if countries in the world only think about maximizing their own interests,the game equilibrium result will not achieve the global Pareto-optimality of global climate governance.
作者 王荧 WANG Ying(Finance college,Fujian Jiangxia University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第7期110-118,共9页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家社科基金资助项目(15BJY080) 福建省社科基金资助项目(FJ2017B093)。
关键词 国际气候博弈 政策预期 帕累托最优 财政收支平衡 全球气候治理 international climate game policy expectations global Pareto-optimality financial balance global climate governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1方晋.G20机制化建设与议题建设[J].国际展望,2010,2(3):19-26. 被引量:10
  • 2Dales J. H. , 1968, Pollution, Property & Prices: An Essay in Policy -making and Economics [M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • 3Coase R. H. , 1960, The Problem of Social Cost [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 3 (1), 1-44.
  • 4Montgomery W. D. , 1972, Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 5 (3), 395-418.
  • 5Hahn R. , 1984, Market Power and Transferable Property Rights [J]. Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics, 99, 753-765.
  • 6Misiolek W. , Elder H. , 1989, Exclusionary Manipulation of Markets for Pollution Rights [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 16, 156 - 166.
  • 7Stavins R. , 1995, Transactions Costs and Tradable Permits [J]. Journal of Environmental Man- agement and Policy, 29, 133-148.
  • 8Franciosi R. , Isaac R. M. , Pingry D. E. and Reynolds S. S. , 1993, An Experimental Investigation of the Hahn-Noll Revenue Neutral Auction for Emissions License [J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 24, 1424.
  • 9Frommand O. , B. Hansjurgens. , 1996, Emission Trading in Theory and Practice : An Analysis of Reclaim in Southern California [J]. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 14, 367- 384.
  • 10Sijm J. M. et. al. , 2007, Options for Post-2012 EUBurden Sharing and EUETS Allocation [R]. Energy Research Center of the Netherlands.

共引文献222

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部