期刊文献+

Systematic review and Meta-analysis of Peitu Shengjin prescription versus H1 antihistamine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Peitu Shengjin prescription versus H1 antihistamine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.Methods:Electronic searching"China Knowledge Network","Wanfang Database","Vip Database","Chinese Biomedical Literature Database",PubMed,Embase,The Cochrane Library,all published on the prescription of Peitu Shengjin prescription comparison H1 antihistamine In randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of drug treatment of allergic rhinitis,two researchers screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and conducted Meta-analysis using RevMan5.3 software.Results:A total of 22 studies were involved,involving a total of 1463 subjects,including 822 in the treatment group and 641 in the control group.Meta-analysis results show that compared with oral H1 antihistamines,Peitu Shengjin prescription can improve the total effective rate of allergic rhinitis(RR=1.19,95%CI[1.14,1.24],P<0.00001);reduce recurrence Rate(RR=0.46,95%CI[0.23,0.90],P=0.02);reduce serum IL-6(MD=-17.33,95%CI[-21.96,-12.70],P<0.00001)and serum IL-8(MD=-100.35,95%CI[-175.18,-25.52],P=0.009);reduce the patient’s total score of symptoms and signs(SMD=-1.21,95%CI[-1.82,-0.61],P<0.0001)And TCM symptom scores(SMD=-0.98,95%CI[-1.28,-0.68],P<0.00001);superior to the control group in improving patients'nasal congestion,nasal itching,and turbinate/nasal mucosa enlargement,in improving runny nose There is no obvious advantage compared with the control group in terms of sneezing symptoms;in terms of safety,there are fewer mild adverse reactions in the treatment group(RD=-0.05,95%CI[-0.09,-0.00],P=0.04).Conclusion:Compared with H1 antihistamine,Peitu Shengjin prescription can improve clinical efficacy,improve patients'symptoms and signs and TCM symptoms,regulate immune function,and is not easy to relapse and has good safety.
出处 《Journal of Hainan Medical University》 2021年第15期40-47,共8页 海南医学院学报(英文版)
基金 Research and Development project of"Ten Diseases and ten Drugs"of Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology(No.Z141100002214018)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1刘利民.变应性鼻炎的中医治疗进展[J].中医耳鼻喉科学研究,2008(2):34-37. 被引量:6
  • 2李淑良.从肾虚论治变应性鼻炎[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(2):4-4. 被引量:15
  • 3ZY/T001-0019-94.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].[S].,..
  • 4Higgins JPT,Green S,editors.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6[updated September 2006].In:The Cochrane Library,Issue 4,2006.Chichester,UK:John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.
  • 5Deeks JJ.Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for metaanalysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.Statistics in Medicine,2002,21:1575-1600
  • 6Cook TD.Advanced statistics:up with odds ratios! A case for odds ratios when outcomes are common.Academic Emergency Medicine,2002,9:1430-1434
  • 7Sackett DL,Deeks JJ,Altman DG.Down with odds ratios! Evidence-BasedMedicine,1996,1:164-167
  • 8Deeks J.When can odds ratios mislead? British Medical Journal 1998,317:1155.
  • 9Senn S.Odds ratios revisited.Evidence-Based Medicine 1998,3:71.
  • 10Olkin I.Odds ratios revisited.Evidence-Based Medicine 1998,3:71.

共引文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部