期刊文献+

倾向性及其系统论进路 被引量:5

Disposition and Its Approach from System Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 反事实条件句是语义学上理解倾向性的基本方式。刘易斯基于反事实条件句提出倾向性的语义学经典表达式,受到马丁"告密倾向性"反例的挑战;刘易斯的改进表达式仍然受到伯德"解毒剂"反例的威胁。系统论和反馈控制器思想将会提供一个新的解决进路。系统的核心要素与核心结构构成了系统的一阶内在属性,是系统因果性的物质性基础,决定了作为二阶属性的倾向性。刺激、反馈控制器、环境、核心要素、核心结构和反应给出了倾向性的反事实条件句表达的新定义。 Counterfactuals are the basic way to interpret disposition in semantics. Lewis put forward the classical expression of disposition on the basis of analyzing counterfactuals, which was challenged by Martin’s "finkish disposition". After improvement, it was still threatened by Bird’s counterexample called "antidote". System theory and feedback controller thought will offer a new solution. The core elements and structure constitute the first-order intrinsic property of the system, which is the material basis of the causality of the system and determines disposition as the second-order property. Combining stimulus, feedback controller, environment, core elements, core structure, and response gives a new definition of disposition.
作者 吴国林 曾云珍 WU Guo-lin;ZENG Yun-zhen(School of Marxism,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641;Institute for Advanced Study in Science,Technology and Philosophy,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第7期122-126,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 2019年国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代量子诠释学研究”(19ZDA038)。
关键词 倾向性 反事实条件句 内在属性 系统论 disposition counterfactuals intrinsic property system theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1F.拉普:《技术哲学导论》,刘武等译,沈阳:辽宁科技出版社,1986年,“英译本序言”,第2页.
  • 2J. C. Pitt, Thinking about Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2000, p. vii.
  • 3P. Kroes and A. Meiiers, "Introduction: A Discipline in Search of Its Identity, " in P. Kroes and A. Meijers, eds., The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Amsterdam: JAI Press, Elservier Science Ltd., 2000, pp. xv-xxi.
  • 4P. Kroes and A. Mejiers, "The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts--Presentation of a New Research Programme, " TechnO, vol. 6, no. 2, 2002, pp.4-6.
  • 5W. Houkes and A. Meiiers, "The Ontology of Artefacts: The Hard Problem," Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 2006, pp. 118-130.
  • 6P. Kroes, "Coherence of Structural and Functional Descriptions of Technical Artefacts," Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 2006, pp. 137-151.
  • 7P. Kroes, "Coherence of Structural and Functional Descriptions of Technical Artefacts, " p. 142.
  • 8乔治·巴萨拉:《技术发展简史》,周光发译,上海:复旦大学出版社,2001年,第32页.
  • 9P. Kroes, "Engineering and the Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts," Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, 2010, p. 51.
  • 10P. Kroes, "Engineering and the Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts, " p. 57.

共引文献30

同被引文献34

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部