期刊文献+

出院压力性损伤风险患者现况及危险因素分析 被引量:7

Status and risk factors of discharged patients at risk of pressure injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:调查存在压力性损伤风险出院患者的现况,并分析压力性损伤的危险因素。方法:采用便利抽样法,选取重庆市涪陵中心医院的54家医联体单位进行横断面调查,将2019年8月—2020年6月出院时存在压力性损伤风险的患者及其照顾者作为研究对象。采用一般人口学资料表、临床检验资料表、Braden压疮风险评估量表、Barthel指数、照顾者照顾能力量表(FCTI)进行调查。本研究共发放问卷409份,回收有效问卷409份,有效回收率为100%。结果:压力性损伤轻度危险患者224例(54.8%),中度危险患者74例(18.1%),高度危险患者89例(21.8%),极度危险患者22例(5.4%)。409例患者的一般人口学资料、临床检验资料、自理能力等级比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同风险等级患者照顾者的FCTI得分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。有序Logistic回归分析结果显示,白细胞计数(OR=1.103,95%CI:1.006~1.209,P=0.035)、照顾者照顾能力(OR=1.060,95%CI:1.017~1.104,P=0.005)、大便失禁(OR=14.112,95%CI:2.505~79.497,P=0.003)、留置导尿管(OR=3.111,95%CI:1.332~7.269,P=0.009)、重度依赖(OR=15.705,95%CI:2.655~92.918,P=0.002)是出院患者压力性损伤风险的危险因素。结论:Braden评分≤18分的出院患者中,压力性损伤中度危险及以上者占45.2%(185/409)。应重点关注白细胞水平高、照顾者照顾能力弱、留置导尿管和自理能力等级为重度依赖的出院患者,以预防压力性损伤发生。 Objective To investigate the current status of discharged patients at risk of pressure injury and analyze risk factors of pressure injury.Methods Using the convenient sampling method,54 medical alliance units of Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital were selected for a cross-sectional survey.Patients at risk of pressure injury when discharged from the hospital and their caregivers were selected as the research objects from August 2019 to June 2020.The general demographic data sheet,clinical test data sheet,Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale,Barthel index,and Family Caregiver Task Inventory(FCTI)were used for investigation.In this study,a total of 409 questionnaires were issued and 409 were effectively received,with an effective recovery of 100%.Results There were 224 patients(54.8%)at light risk of pressure injury,74 patients(18.1%)at moderate risk,89 patients(21.8%)at high risk and 22(5.4%)patients at extreme risk.The differences in general demographic data,clinical test data and self-care ability grade of 409 patients were statistically significant(P<0.05).The FCTI scores of caregivers for patients with different risk levels were compared,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The results of ordered logistic regression analysis showed that white blood cell count(OR=1.103,95%CI:1.006-1.209,P=0.035),care ability of caregivers(OR=1.060,95%CI:1.017-1.104,P=0.005),fecal incontinence(OR=14.112,95%CI:2.505-79.497,P=0.003),indwelling catheter(OR=3.111,95%CI:1.332-7.269,P=0.009),severe dependence(OR=15.705,95%CI:2.655-92.918,P=0.002)were risk factors for the risk of pressure injury in discharged patients.Conclusions Among discharged patients with Braden score less than or equal to 18 points,there are 45.2%(185/409)patients with moderate risk of pressure injury and above.It is necessary to focus on discharged patients with high levels of white blood cells,weak care ability of caregivers,indwelling catheters and self-care ability of heavy dependence grade to prevent pressure injuries.
作者 赵喜兰 陈长蓉 张晓玲 刘春凤 吕孟菊 Zhao Xilan;Chen Changrong;Zhang Xiaoling;Liu Chunfeng;Lyu Mengju(Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 408000,China;Department of Nursing,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 408000,China;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 408000,China;Department of Neurology,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 408000,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2021年第21期2867-2872,共6页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 重庆市科学技术局(cstc2019jscx-msxmX0082)。
关键词 压力性溃疡 压力性损伤 出院患者 风险 影响因素 Pressure ulcer Pressure injury Discharged patients Risk Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1刘雪琴,李漓.老年人疼痛强度评估量表的选择[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(3):165-167. 被引量:67
  • 2肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100. 被引量:4145
  • 3王烈,杨小湜,侯哲,冯巧莲,丸井英二.护理者负担量表中文版的应用与评价[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22(8):970-972. 被引量:575
  • 4Amstrong D,Ayello E,Capitulo K.et aL New opportunities to im-prove pressure ulcer prevention and treatment : Implications of theCMS inpatient hospital care present on admission indicators/hos-pital -accquired conditions( H AC) policy. A consensus paper fromthe international Expert Wound Care Advisory Panel[J]. Journalof Wound,Ostomy & Continence Nursing>2008,35(5) :485.
  • 5Daniel B,Ashkan J. Pressure ulcers: Prevention, evaluation, andmanagement[j]. Am Fam Physician,2008,78( 10) : 1186 - 1194.
  • 6Courtney Lyder, Yun Wang,Mark Metersky, et al. Hospital - ac-quired pressure ulcers:Results from the national medicare patientsafety monitoring system study[J]. The American Geriatrics Soci-ety ,2012 ,60( 9) : 1603 - 1608.
  • 7Lupe L, Zambrana D,Cooper L. Prevention of hospital acquiredpressure ulcers in the operating room and beyond : A successfulmonitoring and intervention strategy program [J]. Intern Anes-thesia Clin,2013,51(1):128 - 146.
  • 8Theilla M,Schwartz B,Cohen J,et al. Impact of a nutritional for-mula enriched in fish oil and micronutrients on pressure ulcers incritical care patients[J]. American Journal of Critical Care,2012,21:102 - 109.
  • 9Margolis DJ.Definition of a pressure ulcer.Adv Wound Care,1995,8(4):8-10.
  • 10Khor HM,Tan J, Saedon Nl,et al.Determinants of mortality among older adults with pressure ulcers.Arch Gemntol Geriatr,2014,59(3):536-541.

共引文献106

同被引文献99

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部