期刊文献+

创客空间资源如何与学校课程相整合——基于美国三所高校课程整合实践的比较研究 被引量:1

How Does the Resource of Maker Space Integrated with School Curriculum:The Comparative Study among Three US Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 为强调学校传统课程可能忽视的技能,美国部分高校已经开始尝试将创客空间及其附带资源与学校学术课程进行整合并将其共同融入创客教育的实践。为进一步厘清学生如何受益于这种"创+学"整合的课程形态及学习机制,本文对耶鲁大学、加州大学伯克利分校、富兰克林欧林工程学院三所高校的"创+学"实践进行了详细介绍和分析,结果发现,尽管三所高校的课程整合方式不尽相同,但整合后的课程类型基本可以归纳为:入门课程、基础课程、核心课程、高级课程及拓展课程这样五个逐步递进的课程形态。而由于每类课程所需要的关键要素和追求的核心素养存在差异,其形成的学习机制也有所不同。分层分类的课程形态和灵活的学习机制不仅高效利用了创客空间及其资源,增强了学校传统学术课程的活力,而且它在学生跨学科知识习得的基础上对其自主学习意识、高阶思维能力和知识迁移能力的培养具有不可估量的意义。本研究对我国高校利用创客空间资源进行课程整合并创新学习机制具有一定启示和借鉴意义。 In order to emphasize the skills that may be ignored in traditional curriculum,some universities in the United States have begun to integrate makerspace and its attached resources with academic curriculum and integrate them into the practice of maker education. In order to further clarify how students benefit from this integrated curriculum form and learning mechanism,this paper introduces and analyzes the curriculum integration practice of Yale University,University of California,Berkeley and Franklin Olin Institute of Engineering in detail.According to the analysis results,although the three universities have different ways of curriculum integration,the curriculum types after integration can be basically summarized into five progressive curriculum forms:introductory curriculum,basic curriculum,core curriculum,advanced curriculum and expansion curriculum.However,because of the differences in the key elements and the core qualities that each kind of curriculum needs,the learning mechanism formed is also different. The hierarchical and classified curriculum form and flexible learning mechanism not only make efficient use of makerspace and its resources,but also enhance the vitality of traditional academic curriculum. Moreover,it is of immeasurable significance to the cultivation of students’ independent learning consciousness,high-level thinking ability and knowledge transfer ability on the basis of their interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition.It is hoped that this study will have some enlightenment and reference significance for universities in China to use makerspace resources for curriculum integration and innovative learning mechanism.
作者 彭小媚 杨庆梅 Peng Xiaomei;Yang Qingmei(College of Education,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou 325035;College of International Entrepreneurship,Kunsan National University)
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第11期74-84,共11页 Research in Educational Development
基金 2018年度国家社科基金(教育学)一般课题“中美高校创客空间培育路径的比较研究”(BDA180028)的部分成果。
关键词 创客空间 课程整合 课程形态 学习机制 maker space curriculum integration curriculum form learning mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1李兆琳.浅谈语文课程形态多元化的表现形式[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2012,35(11):147-149. 被引量:1
  • 2许洁英.国家课程、地方课程和校本课程的含义、目的及地位[J].教育研究,2005,26(8):32-35. 被引量:118
  • 3克里斯·安德森.创客:新工业革命[M].北京:中信出版社,2012,12.
  • 4王春华.中小学信息技术教育发展现状及对策研究[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(4):157-158. 被引量:16
  • 5刘颖,苏巧玲.医学心理学[M].北京:中国华侨出版社,1997.
  • 6教育部.教育部办公厅关于征求对《关于“十三五”期间全面深入推进教育信息化工作的指导意见(征求意见稿)》意见的通知[EB/OL],[2016-03-20].http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201509/t20150907_206045.html.
  • 7孙建锋.有一种课叫"创课"[N].中国教师报,2015-11-18(6).
  • 8杰夫惠.创课.一个要做翻转学习上的新引擎![EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.wtoutiao.com/a/2224621.html.
  • 9内蒙古日报社数字报刊.塑造创客思维[EB/OL].[2016-03-10].http://szb.northnews.cn/nmgrb/html/2015-04/20/content_1192021.htm.
  • 10Dweck, Carol S. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development[M]. Psychology Press, 2000.

共引文献229

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部