期刊文献+

冠心病患者血清CTRP3与Lp-PLA2水平监测的临床价值分析 被引量:11

Clinical value of monitoring serum CTRP3 and Lp-PLA2 levels in patients with coronary heart disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清补体C1q/肿瘤坏死因子相关蛋白3(CTRP3)、脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)与冠心病患者发生急性心肌梗死(AMI)的关系。方法采用病例-对照的研究方法,选择2017年8月至2018年2月中日友好医院住院患者,其中心绞痛组99例,年龄(60.4±10.4)岁,AMI组105例,年龄(61.7±14.3)岁;收集健康体检者60名为对照组,年龄(43.6±9.5)岁。利用酶联免疫法检测血清CTRP3水平,全自动生化分析仪检测Lp-PLA2。Logistic回归分析CTRP3、Lp-PLA2与冠心病患者发生AMI的相关性。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及其曲线下面积(AUC)分析各指标的诊断效能。结果AMI组血清Lp-PLA2水平高于心绞痛组[(313.1±68.1)U/L比(205.8±71.4)U/L],而CTRP3水平低于心绞痛组[(64.2±18.5)μg/L比(84.8±25.0)μg/L],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。在充分调整协变量后,Logistic回归显示血清CTRP3与AMI发病呈负相关(OR=0.964,95%CI 0.935~0.994,P=0.019),Lp-PLA2与AMI发病呈正相关(OR=1.020,95%CI 1.008~1.032,P=0.001)。ROC曲线分析表明,CTRP3诊断AMI的AUC(95%CI)为0.753(0.685~0.821),Lp-PLA2诊断AMI的AUC(95%CI)为0.884(0.833~0.935),二者联合诊断时的AUC(95%CI)为0.910(0.870~0.950)(P均<0.001)。结论血清CTRP3和Lp-PLA2水平在AMI患者中存在异常表达,且均为冠心病患者发生AMI的相关因素,二者联合检测可提高对AMI的诊断效能。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of monitoring serum complement C1q/tumor necrosis factors-associated protein 3(CTRP3)and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2(Lp-PLA2)levels in patients with coronary heart disease,especially patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods This case-control study included 99 patients with angina pectoris aged(60.4±10.4)years,105 patients with AMI aged(61.7±14.3)years,and 60 healthy individuals aged(43.6±9.5)years.Serum CTRP3 was detected by ELISA,and Lp-PLA2 was detected by automatic biochemical analyzer.Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between CTRP3,Lp-PLA2 in angina pectoris and AMI patients.The diagnostic efficiency of each index was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results Serum Lp-PLA2 was significantly higher in AMI group than in angina pectoris group([313.1±68.1]U/L vs[205.8±71.4]U/L,P<0.001),while CTRP3 was significantly lower in AMI group than in angina pectoris group([64.2±18.5]μg/L vs[84.8±25.0]μg/L,P<0.001).Logistic regression showed that serum CTRP3 was negatively correlated with AMI(OR=0.964,95%CI 0.935-0.993,P=0.019),and Lp-PLA2 was positively correlated with AMI(OR=1.020,95%CI 1.008-1.032,P=0.001).ROC analysis showed that the AUC(95%CI)of AMI diagnosed by CTRP3 was 0.753(0.685-0.821),P<0.001;the AUC(95%CI)of AMI diagnosed by Lp-PLA2 was 0.884(0.833-0.935),P<0.001;the AUC(95%CI)of diagnosis efficacy by combined indices was 0.910(0.870-0.950),P<0.001.Conclusions Lower serum CTRP3 and higher serum Lp-PLA2 levels are associated with increased risk for AMI.Combined detection of both indices can improve the diagnostic efficacy of AMI.
作者 周允 魏利龙 张瑞苹 曹永彤 Zhou Yun;Wei Lilong;Zhang Ruiping;Cao Yongtong(Laboratory Medicine,China-Japan Friendship Hospital,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第7期609-614,共6页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(82072337,81400356) 北京市临床重点专科项目(2020年度)。
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 磷脂酶A2 补体C1q/肿瘤坏死因子相关蛋白3 Coronary artery disease Phospholipases A2 C1q/TNF-related proteins 3
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献73

  • 1张坚,满青青,王春荣,李红,由悦,翟屹,李莹,赵文华.中国18岁及以上人群血脂水平及分布特征[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(5):302-305. 被引量:112
  • 2姚崇华,胡以松,翟凤英,杨晓光,孔灵芝,中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组.我国2002年代谢综合征的流行情况[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2007,15(6):332-335. 被引量:135
  • 3Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 4Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 5Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 6Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 7Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 8Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 9Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 10Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.

共引文献6049

同被引文献119

引证文献11

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部