期刊文献+

认罪认罚案件量刑建议的大数据模型建构 被引量:1

The Big Data Model of Sentencing Proposals of Cases with Leniency on Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 量刑建议精准化的关键在于提高量刑能力,定量与自由裁量并行的双轨制量刑方法是较优的选择。可运用数学量刑方法,以法官集体经验为基础,构建量刑模型,并结合案件具体情节对计算结果予以调整。根据"以刑制罪"理念,对犯罪行为具有相似性的犯罪,可构建通用量刑模型,而无需对每个特定罪名分别建模。对不同类型的犯罪,同一量刑情节的适用方式及对量刑结果的影响程度存在差异。调整模型计算结果时,需综合考虑犯罪类型、刑事政策、地理文化特征等具体情况,确保量刑公正。 The key to promoting the accuracy of sentencing proposals is to improve the ability of sentencing. The dual-track approach with both quantitative analysis and discretion is a method for sentencing. It’s necessary to establish a model for sentencing with mathematical methods based on the collective experience of judges and adjust the judgements according to the details of cases. On the basis of the idea“Decide the crime according to the penalty it deserves”, for crimes that have similarities to some extent, the establishment of a common model for sentencing is possible. A specialized model for every single crime is unnecessary. For different types of crimes, the application way of the same circumstance of sentencing and its effect on sentencing varies. To ensure the sentencing justice, specific conditions like the type of the crime, the criminal policies, the geographic and cultural features should be considered when judgements from the model are adjusted.
作者 张曙 彭钰 ZHANG Shu;PENG Yu(Law School,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China)
出处 《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2021年第3期86-95,共10页 Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 浙江省属高校基本科研业务费专项资金“认罪认罚案件量刑建议的大数据分析”(GB202002006)。
关键词 量刑建议 认罪认罚 大数据模型 双轨制 sentencing proposals the admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment big data model the dual-track approach
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献226

共引文献1121

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部