期刊文献+

中国青少年社会与情感能力测评之技术报告 被引量:14

The Technical Report on OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本技术报告基于中国苏州的测评数据,对OECD社会与情感能力测评工具在中国文化下的心理测量学特征进行分析。具体计算Alpha系数和Omega系数来检验这些量表的信度;进行了一系列验证性因子分析来检验这些量表的结构效度;开展多组验证性因子分析来评估不同组(年龄组和性别组)的测量等值性,以及使用项目反应理论广义分步计分模型来衡量项目并为所有参与测评的学生生成社会与情感能力值。 This technical report presents the analysis of Suzhou data in the SSES main study and the assessment of psychometric properties of items and scales that involve a series of iterative modelling and analysis steps.These steps included the calculation of Alpha and Omega to evalute the subscales’relibiabilities;the application of confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)to evaluate constructs;multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis(MGCFA)to review measurement equivalence across groups(age cohorts and gender groups);and using the Item Response Theory(IRT)and Generalised Partial Credit Model(GPCM)to scale items and generate scores for study participants.
作者 张静 唐一鹏 郭家俊 邵志芳 Zhang Jing;Tang Yipeng;Guo Jiajun;Shao Zhifang(Department of Educational Psychology,Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;Department of Education,Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第9期109-126,共18页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 华东师范大学“幸福之花”基金先导项目(2019ECNU-XFZH011)。
关键词 社会与情感能力 信度 验证性因子分析 测量等值 项目反应理论 social and emotional skills reliabilities confirmatory factor analysis measurement equivalence item response theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3784
  • 2郭庆科,王昭,韩丹,时勘.中国高中学生中的反应风格及其效应[J].心理学报,2007,39(1):176-183. 被引量:7
  • 3Cronbach,L J.Response sets and test validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,1946,6:475 ~494
  • 4Rorer L G.The great response style myth.Psychological Bulletin,1965,63:129 ~ 156
  • 5Paulhus D L.Reid D B.Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,60:307 ~317
  • 6Susan R.Acquiescence and conservation.Child Development,1973,44:811 ~814
  • 7Greenleaf E A.Measuring extreme response style.Public Opinion Quarterly,1992,56:328 ~350
  • 8Khailil E A.Extremeness,flexibility,and indifference response sets:a cross-cultural study.the Annual Conference of the American psychological Association,2001
  • 9Bachman J G,OMalley P M.Yea-saying,nay-saying,and going to extreme:black-white difference in response style.Public Opinion Quarterly,1984,48:491 ~ 509
  • 10Stening B W,Evertt J E.Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study.The Journal of Social Psychology,1984,122:151 ~ 156

共引文献7

同被引文献168

引证文献14

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部