目的解释的适用困境与补足——兼论罪刑均衡作为刑法解释目的

Application Dilemma and Complement of Purpose Interpretation:on the balance of crime and punishment as the purpose of criminal law interpretation

目的解释论为刑法解释开启了便利,在利益法学的知识背景下与风险社会的社会背景之下,目的解释论能够快速地将其认为具有可罚性的行为纳入到构成要件的解释范围内,在法律的稳定性与灵活性之间其选择了后者,在对犯罪人人权保障与保护社会之间,其也是选择了后者,因此目的解释论本身就是在社会法益与犯罪人利益之间经过利益衡量得出的选择。然而,"何为目的?谁的目的?"使得目的解释具有强烈的不确定性。法益的抽象化发展使得目的解释朝着不可控制的方向发展。由此,需要通过对目的解释进行限制,将其目的局限在罪刑均衡原则中,才能使其满足刑法保卫社会,保障人权的机能。

The objective interpretation theory of criminal law interpretation opens the convenient,in the interests of the law and risk under the background of the social background of the society,to explain the theory can be quickly think it has to sexual behavior into the constitutive requirements within the scope of the explanation of the law between the stability and flexibility of its chose the latter,in between and protection of human rights protection for criminal society,it is also chose the latter,so the objective interpretation theory itself is between social benefit and the interests of the criminal through interest measure of choice However,what is the purpose?Whose purpose?The abstract development of legal interest makes the interpretation of purpose have strong uncertainty and makes the interpretation of purpose develop in an uncontrollable direction.Therefore,it is necessary to limit the interpretation of purpose and limit its purpose to the principle of balance between crime and punishment so as to meet the function of criminal law to protect society and protect human rights.