期刊文献+

应用型本科院校一流本科专业质量标准的构建研究 被引量:7

The Study on Construction of Quality Criteria of First-class Undergraduate Majors in Local Applied Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着国家和省级一流本科专业的深入推进,众多新建本科院校将建设更多的一流本科专业作为彰显办学水平的重要标志。文章通过分析专业质量标准的内涵,从系统论思想、社会适应性视角、复杂性科学原理等方面,阐释专业建设质量标准构建的理论基础,通过在师生中开展一流本科专业调查分析,提出了应用型本科院校一流本科专业质量标准的基本构架和组成,形成了由专业定位与人才培养思路等8个一级指标、38个二级指标等组成的统一整体,以期为应用型本科院校专业建设和评价一流本科专业提供指导。 With the initiation of national and provincial first-class undergraduate majors programs,many local applied universities increasingly take more first-class undergraduate majors as fundamental symbol of upgrading school running level.The paper analyzes the implication of major quality criteria and explores the theoretical basis for constructing major quality criteria from the viewpoints of system theory,social adaptability and complex science principle.By conducting investigation on first-class undergraduate majors among staffs and students,the paper puts forward the basic framework and components of quality criteria about first-class undergraduate majors.The framework is an integral system,which consists of eight first grade indexes such as specialty orientation and talent training,and thirty-eight secondary indexes.Moreover,the framework is constructed in the expectation of providing guidelines for construction and development about application-oriented majors,first-class undergraduate majors'evaluation.
作者 杨少斌 曹庆年 米国际 张广良 郝红武 YANG Shaobin;CAO Qingnian;MI Guoji
机构地区 西安航空学院
出处 《高教学刊》 2021年第23期5-10,共6页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 2017年度陕西高等教育教学改革研究项目“新建本科院校应用型一流专业建设的研究”(编号:17BG027)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 应用型本科院校 一流本科专业 质量标准 评价体系 local applied universities first-class undergraduate majors quality criteria evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1胡高,胡弼成.高等教育质量:理性评价与认识[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2004,26(4):39-43. 被引量:14
  • 2傅宝英.高等教育质量标准的价值取向与维度分析[J].现代教育科学(高教研究),2005(1):20-22. 被引量:18
  • 3[2]Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA),CHEA Almanac of External Quality Review,Washington D.C.,CHEA,1999,1-25(本文所引统计数据均源于此)
  • 4[3]CHEA, About CHEA, CHEA, http://www.chea.org, 2001.
  • 5[5]CHEA£"Recognition of Accrediting Organizations:Policy and Procedures, CHEA, http://www.chea.org/About/Recognition.cfm, 1998.
  • 6[6]Education Commission of the States (ECS), Education Issues: Accountability, ECS, http://www.ecs.org,2001.
  • 7[7]Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE), U. S. Department of Education (USDE), National Recognition of Accrediting Agencies by the U. S. Secretary of Education,OPE , USDE,http://www. ed.gov/offices/OPE/accreditation/natlrecognition.html,2001.
  • 8[8]Education and Social Science Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College and University Rankings, http://www.library.uiuc/edx/rankings.htm,2001.
  • 9多样化:大众化高等教育质量观.中国教育报.2005年4月8日第4版
  • 10毕家驹.高等教育评估机构的本国认可[J].中国高等教育评估,2000(1):12-15. 被引量:7

共引文献40

同被引文献57

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部