期刊文献+

患者参与医疗决策相关概念框架辨析 被引量:6

Analysis of Conceptual Frameworks Related to Patient Engagement in Medical Decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对患者参与医疗决策的相关核心概念进行了梳理,并对患者参与医疗决策与医患共同决策这两个概念进行了区分,可为国内学者开展相关研究提供概念指导。其次,对患者参与医疗决策的相关理论及概念框架进行了梳理,从适用范围及应用视角对医患共同决策理论、互动式决策框架、渥太华决策支持框架、Makoul模型、Three-Talk模型、Stiggelbout模型、跨专业共同决策模型、共同决策3圈模型进行了分析,其中医患共同决策理论、渥太华决策支持框架、Three-Talk模型已在国内得到应用,而与我国儒家文化提倡以家庭为中心的决策模式相适应的共同决策3圈模型仍未受到关注。 This paper reviewed the core concepts related to patient engagement in medical decision-making and distinguished the concepts between shared decision-making and patient-involved medical decision-making,which provided guidance on certain concepts for domestic scholars.Besides,this paper combed the theoretical and conceptual frameworks related to patient engagement in medical decision-making.From perspectives of application and its sphere,it preliminarily summarized the advantages and disadvantages of shared decision-making model,interactive decision-making framework,Ottawa decision support framework,Makoul model,Three-Talk model,Stiggelbout model,interdisciplinary shared decision-making model,shared decision-making 3 circle model.The shared decision-making model,Ottawa decision support framework and Three-Talk model have been applied in China,but the shared decision-making 3 circle model,which coincides with family-centered decision-making model advocated by Chinese Confucian culture,has not received much attention.
作者 肖霖 彭美芳 刘亚玮 张立力 XIAO Lin;PENG Mei-fang;LIU Ya-wei(School of Nursing/Evidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 北大核心 2021年第14期20-25,共6页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2020年国家自然科学基金青年项目(72004088)。
关键词 患者参与 医疗决策 决策框架 决策模型 patient engagement medical decision-making decision framework decision model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1樊代明.临床决策研究亟待加强[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(12X):1-2. 被引量:20
  • 2张鸣明,李静,张小利,刘雪梅,王莉,何俐,Andrew Herxheimer.中国医生对患者参与医疗决策的理解的问卷调查(英文)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(11):783-785. 被引量:21
  • 3张万岱.临床决策的基本思路[J].医学与哲学(B),2007,28(5):3-5. 被引量:8
  • 4《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》2009年12月26日第七章医疗损害责任.
  • 5傅恩清,金发光,刘静莉.医患心灵交融,科学临床决策的前提[J].中国医学伦理学,2007,20(4):84-85. 被引量:4
  • 6Bowling A, Ebrahim S. Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk[J]. Quality in Health Care,2001,10(Suppl I):i2-i8.
  • 7Kerssens J J, Groenewegen PP, Sixma HI, et al. Comparison of patient e valuations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries[J]. Bull World Health Org,2004, 82(2):106-114.
  • 8Sutherland HJ,Llewellyn-Thomas HA,Lockwood GA,et al. Cancer patients:Their desire for information and participation in treatment deci sions[J]. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1989,82 (3) :260--263.
  • 9Charles C,Whelan T,Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment[J]. Br Med J, 1999, 319(9) :780-782.
  • 10Charles C, Gafni A. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter:revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 1999,49:651-661.

共引文献89

同被引文献69

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部