期刊文献+

社会网络中节点的结构权力研究 被引量:1

Research on the Node Structure Power in Social Network
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的/意义】针对社会网络中节点地位评估创新研究的不足,本文引荐一种新的社会网络节点分析指标,即节点的结构权力(Structural Power,简称SP)指标。【方法/过程】首先,给出SP的定义和计算公式,并用示例说明SP的科学性、合理性;然后,选取我国10所高校情报学领域合作团队为例,计算10个合作团队中成员的SP值;之后,构建10个合作团队的合作网络,获取网络中成员的中心性指标;最后,就合作网络中节点成员的SP值与其中心性指标值进行相关分析。【结果/结论】实证研究表明:SP指标与中心性指标呈显著相关性;SP指标能同时兼顾与其他节点的连接数量、第三成员同时与考察成员和其他成员的连接关系,其他成员之间的连接关系等,是基于整体网络连接关系的一种社会网络中节点的结构权力地位与评价指标。【创新/局限】本研究提出的SP指标既能评价社会网络节点中某一成员的中心地位,又能兼顾其他成员在整体网络中的多种关联。但当社会网络中某一节点的SP值发生变化时,该节点对网络信息的控制能力和整体网络的信息接收能力、传播能力也会发生变化,怎样动态评价节点的SP值是未来需要深入探讨的问题。 【Purpose/significance】In view of the lack of innovative research on the evaluation of node status in social networks,this paper proposes a new network node evaluation index that is structural power of the node.【Method/process】Firstly,this paper gives the definition and calculation formula of SP,and illustrates the scientific and rationality of SP by examples.Next,takes the informatics research team of 10 universities in China as examples and calculates the SP value of members about 10 scientific research teams.Then,establishes a cooperative network of 10 research teams to obtain the central indicators of the network members.Finally,analyses the correlation between SP value and central index value of scientific research team members.【Result/conclusion】Empirical research shows that the SP indicator is significantly correlated with central indicators.The SP index can take into account the multiple connections of other members in the overall network,which is an ideal network node evaluation index based on the overall network connection relationship.【Innovation/limitation】The SP index proposed in this study can not only evaluate the central position of a member in the social network node,but also take into account the multiple associations of other members in the whole network.However,when the SP value of a node in the social network changes,the node’s ability to control network information and the overall network’s ability to receive and disseminate information will also change.How to evaluate the SP value of a node dynamically is a problem that needs to be discussed in the future.
作者 程结晶 邵方圆 CHENG Jie-jing;SHAO Fang-yuan(School of Social Development,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225008,China;School of Economics&Management,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 1000S9,China)
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第8期29-36,共8页 Information Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“大数据时代图书馆服务体系的创新与发展研究”(15BTQ023) 教育部人文社科基金“在线学术社交网络用户科研共享行为研究”(20YJAZH059)阶段性研究成果之一。
关键词 社会网络 结构权力 网络中心性 合作团队 节点中心性 social network structural power network centrality cooperation team node centrality
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1陈勇,胡爱群,胡啸.通信网中节点重要性的评价方法[J].通信学报,2004,25(8):129-134. 被引量:91
  • 2谭跃进,吴俊,邓宏钟.复杂网络中节点重要度评估的节点收缩方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(11):79-83. 被引量:258
  • 3黎加厚,赵怡,王珏.网络时代教育传播学研究的新方法:社会网络分析——以苏州教育博客学习发展共同体为例[J].电化教育研究,2007,28(8):13-17. 被引量:41
  • 4B.Wellman,et a.l.Does the Internet Increase,Decrease,orSupplement Social Capital?[].Social NetworksParticipationand Community Commitment.2001
  • 5Rik Pieters,Hans Baumgartner,Jeroen Vermunt,TammoBijmol.tlmportance and similarity in the evolving citationnetwork of the Research inMarketingInternet[].International Journal of Research in Marketing.1999
  • 6Liaquat Hossain.Effect of organizational Position and networkcentrality Project coordination[].Project Management Journal.2009
  • 7Borgatti S.P,,Everett M.G,,Freeman L.G.Ucinet forWindows:Software for Social Network Analysis[]..2002
  • 8Freeman,L.C.Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification[].Social Networks.1979
  • 9Zhang W,Bai S Y,Jin R.The model of microblog message diffusion based on complex social network[J].International Journal of Modern Physics B,2014,28(20):1450136.
  • 10Wu Y,Hu Y,He X H,et al.Impact of user influence on information multi-step communication in micro-blog[J].Chinese Physics B2014,23(6):60101-060101.

共引文献131

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部