1SUN J, QIN E, LI G S, et al. Effect of hydraulic conditions on flocculation performances and floc characteristics in Chinese herbal extracts by chitosan and chitosan hydrochloride [ J ]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 225: 641-649.
2TAMBO N, WATANABE Y. Physical aspect of flocculation -- I : fundamental treatise [ J ]. Water Research, 1979, 13: 429-439.
3XIAO F, HUANG J C H, ZHANG B J, et al. Effects d low temperature on coagulation kinetics and floe surface morphology using alum[J]. on, 2fl09, 237: 201-213.
4JARVIS P, JEFFERSON B, GREGORY J, et al. A review of floc strength and breakage [ J ]. Water Research, 2005, 39: 3121-3137.
5LI T, ZHU Z, WANG D S, et al. The strength and fractal dimension characteristics of alum-kaolin fls[J]. International Journal d Mineral Processing, 2007, 82: 23-29.
6YU W Z, GREGORY J, CAMPOS L. The effect of additional coagulant on the re-growth of alum-kaolin flocs [ J ]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, 74(3) : 305-309.
7WEI J C, GAO B Y, YUE Q Y, et al. Strength and regrowth properties of polyferric-polymer dual-coagulant flocs in surface water treatment [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 175: 949-954.
8MIKKELSEN L H, KEIDING K. The shear sensitivity of activated sludge: an evaluation of the possibility for a standardised floe strength test [ J ]. Water Research, 2002, 36: 2931-2940.
9WANG Y, GAO B Y, XU X M, et al. Characterization of floc size, strength and structure in various aluminum coagulants treatment [ J ]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 332: 354-359.
10MCCURDY K, CARLSON K, GREGORY D. Floc morphology and cyclic shearing recovery: comparison of alum and polyaluminium chloride coagulants [ J ]. Water Research, 2004, 38: 486-494.
