期刊文献+

广州市中心城区居民健康素养水平及影响因素分析 被引量:15

Analysis on the Levels of Health Literacy and Its Influencing Factors among Residents from the Central Districts of Guangzhou City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解广州市中心4个区15~69岁居民健康素养水平及影响因素,为有针对性制定居民健康素养干预措施和政策提供依据。方法采用分层多阶段随机抽样方法,抽取2018年广州市4个中心城区1515名15~69岁常住居民进行健康素养调查,采用Logistic回归分析居民健康素养水平的影响因素。结果广州市中心4个区居民健康素养水平为28.6%(433/1515)。三方面健康素养水平由高至低依次为基本知识和理念40.1%(608/1515)、基本技能24.5%(358/1515)和健康生活方式与行为23.6%(371/1515);六类健康问题素养水平由高至低依次为安全与急救60.9%(611/1515)、科学健康观40.3%(245/1515)、健康信息36.8%(437/1515)、慢性病防治28.8%(922/1515)、基本医疗25.0%(379/1515)和传染病防治16.2%(558/1515)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,以硕士及以上学历为参照组,小学及以下、初中和高中/职高/中专居民健康素养水平较低OR=0.098(95%CI=0.034~0.282)、OR=0.194(95%CI=0.094~0.401)和OR=0.234(95%CI=0.120~0.457),以60~69岁为参照组,30~39岁、40~49岁居民健康素养水平较高,OR=1.809(95%CI=1.196~2.737)和OR=2.309(95%CI=1.352~3.075)。结论2018年广州市中心4个区居民总体健康素养水平较高,但传染病防治素养较低。高中/职高/中专及以下学历、青少年和老年居民是健康教育重点干预对象。 Objective To understand the level and influencing factors of health literacy among residents aged 15-69 in four central districts of Guangzhou,and to provide basis for targeted health education interventions and policies.Methods A stratified multi-stage random sampling method was used to investigate health literacy of 1515 residents aged 15~69 years in four central urban areas of Guangzhou in 2018.Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of residents'health literacy level.Results The health literacy level of the residents in four central urban areas of Guangzhou was 28.6%(433/1515).From the highest to the lowest of the three aspects of health literacy levels,were in order of the basic healthy knowledge and ideology(40.1%,608/1515),the basic skill literacy(24.5%,358/1515),the healthy lifestyle and behavior literacy(23.6%,371/1515),respectively.The six health literacy levels ranked from high to low as safety and first-aid(60.9%,611/1515),scientific health concepts(40.3%,245/1515),health information(36.8%,437/1515),chronic disease prevention(28.8%,922/1515),basic medical literacy(25.0%,379/1515),basic medical literacy(25.0%,379/1515),and infectious disease prevention(16.2%,558/1515),respectively.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that,using those with a master degree or above as the reference,the health literacy level of primary school students and below,junior high school and senior high school/vocational high school/technical secondary school residents were lower[OR=0.098(95%CI=0.034-0.282)]、[OR=0.194(95%CI=0.094-0.401)]and[OR=0.234(95%CI=0.120-0.457)].While,compared to the 60-69 year-old group,the health literacy level of residents among 30-39 years old and 40-49 years old were higher,[OR=1.809,(95%CI=1.196-2.737)]and[OR=2.309(95%CI=1.352-3.075)].Conclusion The health literacy level of residents in four central districts Guangzhou was generally higher in 2018,but the infectious disease prevention and control was lower.Senior high school/vocational high school/technical secondary school and below,youngsters and senior citizens are the key target population for health education intervention.
作者 罗敏红 陈建伟 孙爱 罗林峰 LUO Minhong;CHEN Jianwei;SUN Ai(Guangzhou Health Publicity and Education Center,Guangzhou,510630,China)
出处 《中国社会医学杂志》 2021年第4期435-440,共6页 Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
基金 广东省医学科研基金项目(A2017121)。
关键词 健康素养 城市居民 影响因素 Health literacy Urban residents Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献101

  • 1陈雯洁,俞茂华.老年人认知功能损害的危险因素[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2005,4(2):146-149. 被引量:30
  • 2佟丽,胡俊峰,侯培森.健康素质与健康素养[J].中国健康教育,2006,22(4):293-295. 被引量:187
  • 3Kish L, Verma V. Complete censuses and samples, J Off Stat,1986,2(4) :381
  • 4Kish L. Multipopulation survey designs: five types with seven shared aspects. Ira Stat Rev, 1994,62(2): 167
  • 5Robert WO,George FB,Susan BS, et al. A comparison of the Kish and last birthday methods of respondent selection in telephone surveys. J Off Stat, 1998,4(4) :307
  • 6Pace E. Leslie Kish, 90: improved science of surveys. New York Times, 2000,150(51541 ): 17
  • 7Smith W, Mitchell P, Attebo K, et al. Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll cormpared with doorto-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Public Health, 1997,21 (2): 127
  • 8Smith W, Chey T, Jalaludin B, et al. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys:a randomized trial. J Public Health Med, 1995,17(1):33
  • 9Wilson A, Bekiaris J,Gleeson S, et al. The good heart,good Life survey: self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors, health knowledge and attitudes among Greek-Australians in Sydney. Aust J Public Health, 1993,17(3) :215
  • 10Donovan RJ, Holman CD, Corti B, et al. Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys. Aust N Z J Public Health, 1997,21 (2): 134

共引文献813

同被引文献208

引证文献15

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部