摘要
违约方司法解除权是在违约方合同解除权之上增设司法认定机制演化而来,其在一定程度上弥补了效率违约理论的缺陷。但尽管如此,违约方司法解除权也并不能完全解决合同僵局问题,且其本身适用范围狭窄、适用条件有限。在双方违约的特殊情况下,违约方司法解除权往往会因突破已有的违约责任体系及合同严守、信赖保护等原则遭遇适用困境。
The judicial dissolution right of the breaching party evolved from the addition of a judicial confirmation mechanism on top of the dissolution right of the breaching party′s contract,which to a certain extent made up for the shortcomings of the efficiency breach of contract theory.But despite this,the judicial dissolution of the breaching party cannot completely solve the problem of contract deadlock,and it has a narrow scope of application and limited applicable conditions.In the special case of breach of contract by both parties,the judicial dismissal of the breaching party often encounters application difficulties due to breakthroughs in the existing liability system for breach of contract and the principles of strict adherence to the contract and protection of trust.
作者
张雄斌
ZHANG Xiongbin(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan,China 610207)
出处
《昆明学院学报》
2021年第4期46-50,共5页
Journal of Kunming University
关键词
违约方司法解除权
效率违约
违约方合同解除权
双方违约
judicial termination of the breaching party
efficiency breach of contract
the right of the breaching party to terminate the contract
breach of contract by both parties