期刊文献+

信用货币创造机制的历史演进逻辑 被引量:6

The Historical Evolution Logic of Credit Money Creation Mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对"存款创造贷款"和"贷款创造存款"两种信用货币创造机制的历史演进逻辑进行详尽阐释,阐明"创造"一词只体现存款和贷款数量增加的发生顺序,而不代表两种业务之间具有绝对的逻辑先后关系。本文强调,两种机制的核心差异在于贷款的自主性,与银行的经营决策、所处的监管环境等多种因素有关,这一结论对两种机制在实践中的适用性带来一定启示。金融监管政策约束较松时,银行可以按客户的借款意愿提供贷款并直接创造出存款。然而金融监管政策约束较紧时,银行需要在存款侧进行监管套利才能发放贷款,此时的贷款只能创造出流动性和安全性都劣于银行存款的"影子负债"。因此,忽视金融监管环境对银行贷款自主性的限制容易导致流动性风险扩散和系统性风险积聚。 This paper sorts out the literature and evolution logic of two credit money creation mechanisms,"Deposit Creates Loan"(DCL) and"Loan Creates Deposit"(LCD). Under the DCL mechanism, banks need to issue loans from existing deposits. While under the LCD mechanism, the ability to issue deposit money allows banks to directly create equivalent deposits while issuing loans. An in-depth understanding of both mechanisms is a prerequisite for analyzing bank business,money, and credit.It is found that the term"create"only reflects the order of occurrence of deposits and loans, and does not represent an absolute logical sequence. DCL and LCD are more like different views of loan-deposit relations rather than two exclusive theories. The DCL mechanism describes the constraints faced by banks, while the LCD mechanism describes banks’ credit expansion. The key difference lies in the autonomy of loans, which is related to factors including the bank’s business decision and the regulatory environment. For banks with relatively weak loan autonomy, loans need to be made from existing deposits.The stronger the autonomy of loans, the more likely banks can directly create deposits through loans. This conclusion has enlightening significance for the application of these two mechanisms in practice.When regulatory constraints are loose, banks can provide loans directly according to customers’ willingness to borrow.Therefore, the LCD mechanism can better describe the process of credit money creation. However, when regulatory constraints(such as reserve requirements) bind, banks need to carry out regulatory arbitrage on their deposits to issue loans. Under this circumstance, loans cannot create real deposits, but can only create"shadow liabilities"whose liquidity and safety are both inferior to those of bank deposits. Therefore, ignoring the constraints of financial regulatory environment on banks’ loan autonomy easily leads to the spread of liquidity risks and the accumulation of systemic risks.
作者 张成思 尹学钰 刘泽豪 Zhang Chengsi;Yin Xueyu;Liu Zehao(School of Finance,Renmin University of China)
出处 《国际金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第7期3-12,共10页 Studies of International Finance
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“双循环系统下的货币政策与财政政策协调配合研究”(20&ZD104)资助。
关键词 信用货币 货币创造 金融监管 影子银行 Credit Money Money Creation Financial Regulation Shadow Banking
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1李宏瑾.中央银行、信用货币创造与“存差”——兼对近年中国人民银行货币操作行为的分析[J].金融研究,2006(10):8-22. 被引量:17
  • 2吴忠群.原始存款与基础货币的对应关系[J].财贸经济,2006,27(10):16-22. 被引量:4
  • 3刘絮敖.2010:《国外货币金融学说》,中国金融出版社.
  • 4李嘉图(1817):《政治经济学及赋税原理(中译本)》,译林出版社2011年版.
  • 5亚当·斯密(1776):《国民财富的性质和原因的研究(中译本)》,商务印书馆2008年版.
  • 6约翰·穆勒(1848):《政治经济学原理(中译本)》,华夏出版社2009年版.
  • 7Arestis, P. and P. Howells (1996) : "Theoretical Reflections on Endogenous Money: The Problem with 'Convenience Lending"', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 539-551.
  • 8FSB (2012): Global Shadow Banking Monitoring Report 2012. FSB (2013): Global Shadow Banking Monitoring Report 2013.
  • 9Hahn, L (1920): Volkswirtschqftliche Theorie des Bankkredits, Tubingen 1920: J,C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck); 2nd ed. 1924; 3rd rev. ed. 1930; Italian Translation as Teoria Economica Del Credito, edited and introduced by Lapo Berti, Naples 1990: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  • 10Hayek, F. (1931): Prices and Production, 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

共引文献26

同被引文献79

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部