期刊文献+

FK506、肾功能指标及单个核细胞计数判断肾移植患者尿BKV DNA阳性的价值 被引量:1

Roles of FK506,renal function indexes and mononuclear cell count in the judgment of renal transplant recipients with positive urinary BKV DNA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血FK506、尿素、肌酐(Cr)及单个核细胞计数判断肾移植患者尿BK病毒(BKV)DNA阳性的价值。方法检测197例肾移植患者尿BKV DNA及血FK506、尿素、Cr、淋巴细胞百分比(LYMPH%)、淋巴细胞绝对值(LYMPH#)、单核细胞百分比(MO%)、单核细胞绝对值(MO#)。以尿BKV DNA≥2.0×10^(3)拷贝/mL为BKV阳性组,<2.0×10^(3)拷贝/mL为BKV阴性组。另选取21例术后3~6个月内多次检测尿BKV DNA,并首次出现阴性转阳性的患者进行配对比较。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价各项指标判断尿BKV DNA阳性的效能。采用Pearson相关分析或Spearman相关分析评估各项指标与尿BKV DNA载量的相关性。对比21例患者首次出现尿BKV DNA由阴性转阳性时各项指标的变化。结果BKV阳性组FK506、尿素、Cr水平高于BKV阴性组(P<0.05),2个组之间LYMPH%、LYMPH#、MO%、MO#差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。相关性分析结果显示,尿BKV DNA载量与血FK506水平呈正相关(r=0.466,P<0.001),与尿素、Cr无相关性(r值分别为0.157、0.156,P>0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,FK506、尿素和Cr判断尿BKV DNA阳性的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.685、0.581、0.606,最佳临界值分别为7.05 ng/mL、7.20 mmol/L、100.5μmol/L,敏感性分别为58.3%、71.4%、83.3%,特异性分别为74.3%、46.0%、38.1%。与尿BKV DNA阴性时比较,同一患者首次出现尿BKV DNA阳性时的FK506水平明显升高(P<0.001),尿素及Cr水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论血FK506对判断肾移植术后患者尿BKV DNA阳性有一定价值。 Objective To investigate the roles of FK506,urea,creatinine(Cr)and mononuclear cell count in the judgment of renal transplant recipients with positive urinary BK virus(BKV)DNA.Methods Urinary BKV DNA were determined in 197 renal transplant recipients,which the cases≥2.0×10^(3) copies/mL were enrolled in positive group,and which the cases<2.0×10^(3) copies/mL were enrolled in negative group.The differences of FK506,urea,Cr,the percentage of lymphocyte(LYMPH%)and the absolute value of lymphocyte(LYMPH#),the percentage of monocyte(MO%)and the absolute value of monocyte(MO#)between the 2 groups were evaluated.A total of 21 patients with negative to positive urinary BKV DNA within 3 to 6 months after transplantation were enrolled for matching comparison.The efficiency of determining positive urinary BKV DNA by each indicator was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,and the correlation between each indicator and urinary BKV DNA load was evaluated by Pearson or Spearman analysis.The indicators with significant difference were compared in 21 recipients with the first change of urinary BKV DNA from negative to positive.Results The levels of FK506,urea and Cr in BKV positive group were higher than those in BKV negative group(P<0.05).LYMPH%,LYMPH#,MO%and MO#showed no statistical significance between the 2 groups(P>0.05).Urinary BKV DNA load was positively correlated with FK506(r=0.466,P<0.001),and there was no correlation with urea(r=0.157)and Cr(r=0.156)(P>0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under curves(AUC)of FK506,urea and Cr for the positive determination of urinary BKV DNA were 0.685,0.581 and 0.606,respectively.The optimal cut-off values were 7.05 ng/mL,7.20 mmol/L and 100.5μmol/L,respectively.The sensitivities were 58.3%,71.4%and 83.3%,and the specificities were 74.3%,46.0%and 38.1%,respectively.FK506 was increased in the 21 recipients when they firstly experienced urinary BKV DNA conversion from negative to positive(P<0.001),and urea and Cr had no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusions FK506 is valuable in the judgment of renal transplant recipients with positive urinary BKV DNA.
作者 黄思聪 石永杰 嘉红云 HUANG Sicong;SHI Yongjie;JIA Hongyun(Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510260,Guangdong,China)
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2021年第8期837-842,共6页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 FK506 肾功能指标 单个核细胞计数 BK病毒 肾移植 FK506 Renal function index Mononuclear cell count BK virus Renal transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1许足三,陈善群,孙建明,孙龙飞,李勇,龚烨.肾移植术后受者T淋巴细胞亚群监测及临床分析[J].中国医学工程,2009,17(5):362-364. 被引量:3
  • 2刘湘帆,董雷鸣,曹文俊,倪培华,樊绮诗.肾脏移植术后病人BK病毒检测的初步研究[J].中国实验诊断学,2005,9(4):601-603. 被引量:3
  • 3朱云松,王尉,肖远松,邓志雄,张利朝,赵永斌,聂海波,胡卫列,吕军.T淋巴细胞亚群在肾移植受者术后感染中的动态变化[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(12):1828-1829. 被引量:6
  • 4Hirseh HH, Knowles W, Dickenmann M, et al. Prospective study of polyomavirus type BK replication and nephropathy in renal-transplant recipients[ J]. N Engl J Med,2002,347 (7) :488-496.
  • 5Leung AY, Yuen KY, Kwong YL. Polyoma BK virus and haemorrhagic cystitis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a changing paradigm [ J ]. Bone Marrow Transplant,2005,36 ( 11 ) : 929-937.
  • 6Manikandan R, Kumar S, Dorairajan LN. Hemorrhagic cystitis: a challenge to the urologist [ J ]. Indian J Urol,2010,26 (2): 159-166.
  • 7Decker DB, Karam JA, Wilcox DT. Pediatric hemorrhagic cystitis [ J ] J Pediatr Urol, 2009,4 ( 5 ) : 254 -264.
  • 8Mori Y, Miyamoto T, Kato K, et al. Different risk factors related to adenovirus- or BK virus-associatedhemorrhagic cystitis following a11ogeneic stem cell transplantation [ J ]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2012,18 (3) :458-465.
  • 9Hirsch HH, Brennan DC, Draehenberg CB, et al. Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation : interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations [ J 1. Transplantation, 2005, 79 (10) :1277-1286.
  • 10Randhawa PS, Demetris AJ. Nephropathy due to polyomavirus type BK[J]. N Engl J Med,2000,342 (18) :1361-1363.

共引文献27

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部