摘要
牛运震在《读史纠谬》卷四中对《三国志》的编纂体例、史实真伪、观点高下等做出具体的指陈,特别是结合《诸葛亮传》及有关诸葛亮的事迹,评断史法得失、史文曲直、史体是非、史实正误、史识短长。通过这些论断,可以管窥其史学批评的风格和特色。
Niu Yunzhen made specific comments on the compilation style,historical records,and different views of Records of the Three Kingdoms in volume 4 of Reading Histories and Correcting Fallacies.Combined with The Biography of Zhuge Liang and the deeds of Zhuge Liang,he judged the gains and losses on other scholars’historical methods,historical records,historical styles,historical facts,and the historical knowledge.Through these arguments,we can have a glimpse of the style and characteristics of his historical criticism.
作者
刘治立
LIU Zhili(School of History and Geography, Longdong University, Qingyang, Gansu 745000, China)
出处
《平顶山学院学报》
2021年第4期76-80,共5页
Journal of Pingdingshan University
基金
四川省社会科学重点研究基地区域文化研究中心项目“王夫之的三国史论研究”(QYYJC1905)。
关键词
牛运震
《读史纠谬》
《诸葛亮传》
Niu Yunzhen
Reading Histories and Correcting Fallacies
Biography of Zhuge Liang