期刊文献+

不同结构探针对压气机进口级流场及测量结果的影响 被引量:3

Effects of probes with different structures on the flow field and measurement results of imported compressors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用数值模拟的方法,研究了某涡轴发动机压气机进口级流道中2种不同类型的总压探针和总温探针的测量精度以及这两种探针对流场的影响,分析探针在巡航、最大连续、起飞3个典型工作状态下,探针结构以及安装位置对探针测量结果的影响。研究结果表明:发动机进口流量越大,探针的测量误差越大;相较于总温探针,总压探针测量准确度受流量的影响更大;速度均匀度受发动机工况的影响较小,主要与插入的探针结构有关;越靠近支板的总压探针,测量误差越大;探针安装位置对出口处总压损失系数的影响较小。 In this paper,the measurement accuracy of two different types of total pressure probe and total temperature probe in turboshaft engine compressor inlet channel and the influence of these two probes on the flow field through numerical simulation was studied.At the same time,the influence of the probe structure and installation position on probe measurement results under three typical working conditions of cruise,maximum continuous and takeoff was analyzed.The simulation results showed that the higher the engine inlet flow rate,the greater the measurement error of the probe.Comparing with the total temperature probe,the total pressure probe measurement accuracy is more influenced by the flow rate.The velocity uniformity is less affected by the engine operating conditions and is mainly related to the structure of the inserted probes.The closer the total pressure probe to the support plate,the greater the measurement error.The probe installation position has a small effect on the total pressure loss coefficient at the outlet.
作者 郑光华 水飞 胡金鑫 刘鑫 肖华中 ZHENG Guanghua;SHUI Fei;HU Jinxin;LIU Xin;XIAO Huazhong(School of Power and Energy,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi′an 710129,China;General Research Department,China National Aero-Developmerot,Zhuzhou 412002,China)
出处 《西北工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期858-864,共7页 Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
关键词 压气机进口级 总压探针 总温探针 测量误差 速度均匀度 总压损失系数 compressor inlet level total pressure probe total temperature probe measurement error speed uniformity total pressure loss coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1李坦,靳世平,黄素逸,刘伟.流场速度分布均匀性评价指标比较与应用研究[J].热力发电,2013,42(11):60-63. 被引量:99
  • 2林其勋,许都纯,刘松龄.压力探针临壁效应的试验研究[J].航空动力学报,1996,11(1):56-58. 被引量:7
  • 3孙志强,周孑民,张宏建,胡剑.皮托管测量影响因素分析 I.检测杆与安装角的影响[J].传感技术学报,2007,20(3):690-693. 被引量:28
  • 4国家质量监督检验检疫总局JJF1059.1-2012测量不确定度评定与表示[S],北京:中国标准出版社,2013:1-30.
  • 5宋双杰,张玉莲.大气总温传感器的误差修正研究[J].大众科技,2007,9(12):103-105. 被引量:4
  • 6Abernathy R B,Powell B D,Colbert D L,et al.Handbookuncertainty in gas turbine measurements[R].AEDC-TR-73-5.
  • 7Castrup S.NASA-HDBK-8739.19-2 NASA measurement quality assurance handbook,annex 2:measuring and test equipment specifications[M].Washington DC:National Aeronautics and Space Administration,2010:1-121.
  • 8Castrup S,Howard T.NASA-HDBK-8739.19-2 NASA measurement quality assurance handbook annex 3:measurement uncertainty analysis principles and methods[M].Washington DC:National Aeronautics and Space Administration,2010:1-134.
  • 9American Society of Mechanical Engineers.ASME PTC 19.1-2005 test uncertainty[S].New York:ASME,2005:1-68.
  • 10American Society of Mechanical Engineers.ASME PTC 19.2-1987 (R2004) pressure measurement[S].New York:ASME,1987:1-134.

共引文献88

同被引文献12

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部