期刊文献+

“弱者胜”——论赛博空间的一种权力逻辑

“The Weaker,the Winner”-A Logic of Power in Cyberspace
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “空间”与“权力”始终是相伴相生的范畴。“弱者胜”是赛博空间中独特的权力逻辑,这一逻辑在当代中国的新媒体事件中被不断操演。基于对“强者”的标签式解读,对社会公共事件的二元化构造,以及对大量视觉符码的象征性运用,赛博空间先验地确证了“弱者”的合法性,而将“强者”被指认为需要遭贬抑与拒斥的“罪恶的化身”。究其实质,“弱者胜”是一种带有鲜明倾向性的阐释模式,它一方面根植于赛博空间的技术情境,另一方面又受到转型期社会-文化情境的深刻塑造。作为一种在地化的空间实践,“弱者胜”体现出诸多积极功效,亦暴露出一系列值得警醒的症候与缺失。 The two categories,“Space”and“Power”,co-exist with each other.“The weeker,the winner”is a unique logic of power in cyberspace,this logic has been performed repeatedly in new media events in present China.Based on the reading by the label of“the strong”,the dualistic construction of social public events,as well as the symbolic use of various visual codes,cyberspace presupposes the legitimacy of“the weaker”,and defines“the strong”as the very incarnation of evil that must be condemned and rejected.In essence,“the weaker,the winner”is an interpretation mode with strong tendencies.On the one hand,it is rooted in the technological situation of cyberspace,on the other hand,it is remarkably shaped by the social-cultural situation during the transformation period.As a spatial practice of localization,“the weaker,the winner”has shown many positive effects,but also exposes a series of alarming symptoms and deficiencies.
作者 庞弘 Pang Hong
出处 《文化研究》 2020年第2期221-234,共14页 Cultural Studies
基金 国家社科基金青年项目“‘阐释的边界’与当代文学理论的话语重估研究”(18CZW006)阶段性成果。
关键词 “弱者胜” 赛博空间 权力逻辑 新媒体事件 社会转型 “the weaker,the winner” cyberspace logic of power new media events social transformation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1郑大群.论传播形态中的身体叙事[J].学术界,2005(5):183-189. 被引量:45
  • 2刘正荣.从非理性网络舆论看网民群体心理[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2007,29(3):167-168. 被引量:71
  • 3卡勒.《论解构》.陆扬译.中国社会科学出版社,1998年版,第2页.
  • 4Roman Jakobson, Language in Literature, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987, p. 63.
  • 5托多洛夫.《诗学》.赵毅衡编.《符号学文学论文选》.百花文艺出版社,2004年版,第195页.
  • 6Paul de Man, The Resistance to Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, p. 7.
  • 7Cf.Richard Rorry (ed.), The Linguistic Turn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, p. 9.
  • 8Cf. Michael Losonsky, Linguistic Turns in Modem Philosophy,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • 9Richard Rorty (ed.), The Linguistic Turn, p. 8.
  • 10Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, London: Routledge, 1961, p. 68.

共引文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部