期刊文献+

超声联合区域神经阻滞对中青年胫骨骨折患者麻醉效果分析 被引量:4

Analysis on the anesthetic effect of ultrasonography combined with regional nerve block on young and middle-aged patients with fractures of tibia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声联合区域神经阻滞对中青年胫骨骨折患者的麻醉效果。方法:选取在医院就诊的70例中青年胫骨骨折患者,依据麻醉方法的不同将其分为观察组和对照组,每组35例。观察组接受超声联合区域神经阻滞麻醉方法,对照组接受硬膜外神经阻滞麻醉方法,比较两组患者的麻醉效果和不良反应发生情况,评价视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分情况。结果:观察组患者的麻醉起效时间、术后睁眼时间和完全清醒时间显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=7.394,t=6.643,t=6.478;P<0.05);观察组患者的麻醉优良率显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.293,P<0.05);观察组患者术后12 h、24 h和48 h的VAS评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=11.111,t=4.801,t=4.220;P<0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率为5.71%,对照组为11.43%,两组相比差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.729,P>0.05)。结论:超声联合区域神经阻滞对中青年胫骨骨折患者具有较好的麻醉效果,且安全可靠。 Objective:To investigate the anesthetic effect of ultrasonography combined with regional nerve block on young and middle-aged patients with fractures of tibia.Methods:70 patients with fractures of tibia who admitted to hospital were enrolled.And they were divided into observation group who received ultrasound combined with regional nerve block anesthesia method and control group who received epidural nerve block anesthesia,with 35 patients in each group.The anesthesia effect,occurrence of adverse reaction and visual analogue scale(VAS)of two groups were compared.Results:The onset time,postoperative eye opening time and full awake time of observation group were significantly shorter than those of control group(t=7.394,t=6.643,t=6.478,P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of anesthesia of observation group was significantly better than that of control group(χ^(2)=6.293,P<0.05).The VAS scores of patients of observation group at 12 th h,24 th h and 48 th h after surgery were significantly lower than those of control group(t=11.111,t=4.801,t=4.220,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between observation group and control group(5.71%VS 11.43%)(χ^(2)=0.729,P>0.05).Conclusion:Ultrasonography combined with regional nerve block has good anesthetic effect on young and middle-aged patients with fractures of tibia and its safety is reliable.
作者 陈名正 符尚宏 王雪峰 王斌 何宗珊 CHEN Ming-zheng;FU Shang-hong;WANG Xue-feng(Department of Ultrasound,The Third People's Hospital of Haikou City,Haikou 570100,China;不详)
出处 《中国医学装备》 2021年第8期109-112,共4页 China Medical Equipment
基金 海南省自然科学基金面上项目(819MS141)“闭合复位空心螺钉内固定结合血管介入富血小板血浆注射治疗中青年股骨颈骨骨折的多中心临床研究”。
关键词 胫骨骨折 超声联合区域神经阻滞 硬膜外神经阻滞 麻醉效果 Fracture of tibia Ultrasound combined with regional nerve block Epidural nerve block Anesthetic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献72

  • 1赵蕊,徐仲煌,黄宇光.区域阻滞复合喉罩在高龄患者下肢手术的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(8):602-602. 被引量:13
  • 2景亮.高度重视老年患者术后肺部并发症[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(2):169-170. 被引量:17
  • 3郭献阳,徐旭仲,陈丽梅,李挺,余微萍.罗哌卡因单用及复合不同浓度利多卡因对坐骨神经起效时间的影响[J].温州医学院学报,2007,37(3):240-243. 被引量:14
  • 4Dony P, Dewinde V, Vanderick B, et al. The comparative toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equipotent doses in rats [ J ]. Anesth Analg ,2000,91 : 1489.
  • 5DaviesAF, Segar EP,Murdoch J,et al. Ep idural infusion or combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia for knee arthrop lasty[ J ]. Br J Anesth,2004,93 ( 3 ) : 121.
  • 6Fanelli G, Casati A, Carancini P, et al. Nerve stimulator and multiple injections technique for upper and lower limb blockade : failure rate , patient acceptance and neurologic complications [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1999,88(3 ) :847.
  • 7陈伯銮.局部麻醉药.见:庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮,主编.现代麻醉学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.632—633.
  • 8Hohlrieder M,Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, et al. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airwaymorbidity, and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2007,99 : 576 580.
  • 9Casati A,Vinciguerra F,Santorsola R,et al. Sciatic nerve block with 0.5% levobupivacaine, 0. 75% evobupivacaine or 0.75% ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized comparison. Eur J AnaesthesioI, 2005,22 :452-456.
  • 10Shirakami G, Teratani Y, Segawa H, et al. Omission of fentanyl during sevoflurane anesthesia decreases the incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting and accelerates postanesthesia recovery in major breast cancer surgery. J Anesth, 2006,20: 188-195.

共引文献111

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部