重复性供述排除规则实证研究——以132份裁判文书为分析对象

Empirical study on the exclusion rule of repeated confessions——Taking 132 judgment documents as the analysis objects

2017年“两高三部”《关于办理刑事案件严格排除非法证据若干问题的规定》初步构建了“原则加例外”的重复性供述排除规则。随着该规则在司法实践中被广泛适用,其存在的问题也逐渐显露出来。通过对裁判文书网上相关文书的整理分析发现,过于狭窄的前提条件、“例外规定”的不规范适用、法院的被动性、模糊的证明责任、监检办案程序衔接不顺畅等问题都成为重复供述排除规则在实践中适用的阻因。以实证研究的方式,对司法实践中重复性供述排除规则的适用情形进行整理和归纳,可以为实践中出现的上述问题提供有效的解决路径。

In 2017,the“Provisions on Strictly Excluding Illegal Evidence in Handling Criminal Cases”of the“Two Highs and Three Departments”preliminarily established the“principles plus exceptions”exclusion rule of repeated confessions.As the rule has been widely applied in judicial practice,its existing problems have gradually emerged.Through the sorting and analysis of relevant online documents of judgment documents,it is found that problems such as too narrow preconditions,irregular application of“provisions on exceptions”,passivity of the court,vague burden of proof and rough connection between supervision and inspection of case handling procedures have all become the obstruction to the application of exclusion rule of repeated confessions in practice.Through the empirical research,sorting out and summarizing the application of the exclusion rule of repeated confessions in judicial practice can provide an effective solution to the problems in the above-mentioned practice.