摘要
本文首先介绍并讨论认知类型学中连动式的界定标准,并应用该标准比对分析Li&Thompson的四类汉语连动式,得出Li&Thompson的四类“连动式”并不全是认知类型学意义上的连动式。本文的讨论有助于归纳汉语连动式的主要语法特征,并为后续汉语认知类型学的考察奠定基础。
This paper introduces the criteria proposed by Bisang to define serial verb construction(SVC).The criteria are evaluated and refined so as to explain Chinese SVCs.And these criteria are used to test against the four types of“SVCs”identified by Li and Thompson in Chinese.In this way,a set of examples which are clearly real SVCs in terms of cognitive typology are identi⁃fied and the grammatical properties of Chinese SVCs are also summarized.These findings provide a key to data collection of SVCs in the future research on Mandarin's cognitive typology.
作者
杨洁
YANG Jie(School of Foreign Studies,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266580,China)
出处
《外文研究》
2021年第3期20-27,106,107,共10页
Foreign Studies
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“基于运动事件的汉语语言类型学研究”(17CX04060B)。