知识产权垄断性质疑:历史与逻辑

A critique of monopolization of intellectual property rights:History and logic

目前,一些关于“垄断性”的表述反映了业界对知识产权的误解,如将垄断性视为知识产权与物权的区别,知识产权必然导致经济垄断并直接成为反垄断法规制的对象。该误解源于将“垄断性”解释为知识产权的专有性,混淆了知识产权垄断性与经济垄断、反垄断规制之间的关系。封建特许权造成的垄断在知识财产的私权化后已经嬗变,知识产权与经济垄断、反垄断并无直接与必然的联系,因此知识产权“垄断性”的表述将终究难逃被摒弃的命运。

At present,some expressions of“monopolization”reflects the industry’s misunderstanding on intellectual property rights,such as treat monopolization as the difference between intellectual property rights and real right,and intellectual property rights will inevitably lead to economic monopoly and directly become the object of anti-monopoly regulation.The misunderstanding stems from the interpretation of“monopolization”as the exclusivity of intellectual property rights,which confuses the relationship between the monopolization of intellectual property rights and economic monopoly and anti-monopoly regulation.The monopoly caused by feudal special permit has changed after the privatization of intellectual property.Intellectual property rights has no direct connection with economic monopoly and anti-monopoly,and the proposition that“intellectual property rights has monopolization”will finally fade away.