期刊文献+

不同类型生师互动及其对本科生学习效果的影响研究 被引量:8

A Study on Different Types of Student-faculty Interaction and Its Effects on Undergraduates’Learning Outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究运用H大学“本科生就读经历调查”数据,考察不同类型生师互动水平,探究其对学生认知技能、操作及社交技能、满意度和归属感的净影响。结果表明,不同背景特征学生在不同类型生师互动水平上存在显著差异。在控制学生输入特征和其他院校环境变量后,“课程相关的生师互动”与上述所有学习效果无显著相关,“非课程的生师互动”对学生认知技能和满意度有显著正影响,“辅助教师进行研究”对所有的学习效果有显著正影响。建议院校重视生师互动价值,以制度激励教师投入生师互动;开拓生师互动渠道,为学生提供人性化课程体验;校院两级组织支持,提高本科生教师科研参与度。 The data of H university’s“survey of students’learning experience”was used to investigate the difference of interaction level between the undergraduates and teachers,and its impact on students’cognitive skills,operational and social skills,satisfaction and sense of belonging was explored.The results show that there are significant differences in the level of student-faculty interaction among different gender,economic class,parents’education level,grade and subject.After controlling students’input characteristics and other institutional environment variables,“course related student-faculty interaction”has no significant correlation with all the above learning effects,while“non-course student-faculty interaction”has a significant positive impact on students’cognitive skills and satisfaction,and“assistant teacher research”has a significant positive impact on all the learning effects.It is suggested that colleges and universities should attach importance to the value of student-faculty interaction,encourage teachers to participate in student-faculty interaction by system,open up channels of student-faculty interaction to provide students with humanistic curriculum experience,and provide two-level organizational support to enhance undergraduate teachers’scientific research participation.
作者 徐丹 戴文静 刘声涛 XU Dan;DAI Wenjing;LIU Shengtao(Institute of Education Sciences,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出处 《重庆高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期82-94,共13页 Chongqing Higher Education Research
基金 湖南省教育科学规划基金项目“湖南省双一流建设高校本科生科研参与现状、影响因素及效果研究”(XJK19AGD003)。
关键词 研究型大学 本科生 生师互动 学习效果 research university undergraduate student student-faculty interaction learning outcomes
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献54

  • 1鲍威.扩招后中国高校学生的学习行为特征分析[A].2008年中国教育经济学年会会议论文集[C].2008.
  • 2约翰·D·布兰斯福特,安·L·布郎,等.人是如何学习的--大脑、心理、经验及学校[M].程可拉,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.
  • 3李瑾.中国文化的学习模式[A].见:范良火,黄毅英,蔡金法,李士锜.华人如何学习数学[C].南京:江苏教育出版社,2005.
  • 4艾德加·莫兰.社会学思考[M].上海:上海人民出版社.2001年版.第422-423页
  • 5中华人民共和国教育部.2013年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].2014-08-23.http://www.moe.gov.cn/publishflles/busi-ness/htmlfiles/moe/moe_633/201407/171144.html.
  • 6Astin A W. Assessment for Excellence: the Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education [M ]" New York: ORYX press, 1991.6.
  • 7Kuh G D. What We Are Learning about Student Engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices [J]. Change, 2003, (2).
  • 8Pasearella E T, Terenzini P T. How College Affects Students: a Third Decades of Research [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.17.
  • 9Carini R M, Kuh G D. Klein S P. Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2006, (1).
  • 10Hughes R, Pace C R. Using NSSE to Study Student Retention and Withdrawal[J]. Assessment Update, 2003, (4).

共引文献175

同被引文献144

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部