期刊文献+

体外开窗腔内修复术治疗Ⅲ型主动脉夹层累及分支血管的效果及远期预后观察 被引量:1

Effect and long-term prognosis of fenestrated thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair on patients with typeⅢaortic dissection involving branch vessels
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探究体外开窗腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗Ⅲ型主动脉夹层累及分支血管的效果及对患者远期预后的影响。方法:抽取2016年10月至2018年5月在南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院接受治疗的78例Ⅲ型主动脉夹层累及分支血管患者为研究对象,根据手术方式将患者分为观察组(行体外开窗TEVAR治疗,43例)和对照组(行单纯TEVAR治疗,35例)。比较两组患者的手术时间和围术期情况;术后随访2年,比较两组患者的支架通畅率、内漏发生率、并发症发生情况、手术再干预率及远期生存率。结果:观察组手术时间长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术中支架全部释放成功。围术期,观察组出现1例轻微支架远端内漏,对照组出现2例Ⅰ型内漏。随访2年,观察组失访2例,对照组失访3例。术后6个月,两组患者支架畅通率均为100.00%;观察组并发症发生率(4.88%,2/41)低于对照组(21.88%,7/32),P<0.05;两组患者内漏发生率比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组随访期间无再次手术者,对照组随访期间有4例再次行TEVAR治疗,观察组再干预率(0.00%,0/41)低于对照组(12.50%,4/32),P<0.05。观察组2年生存率(97.56%,40/41)与对照组(90.63%,29/32)比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:应用体外开窗TEVAR治疗累及分支血管的Ⅲ型主动脉夹层,可明显减少患者短期并发症,降低术后2年内的手术再干预率,患者远期预后效果良好。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect and the long-term prognosis of fenestrated thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair(TEVAR)in the treatment of typeⅢaortic dissection involving branch vessels.Methods A total of 78 patients with typeⅢaortic dissection involving branch vessels who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College from October 2016 to May 2018 were selected as the research objects.The patients were divided into observation group(treated by fenestrated TEVAR,n=43)and control group(treated by TEVAR,n=35)according to the operation methods.The operation time and perioperative conditions of the two groups were compared.All patients were followed up for 2 years.The stent patency rate,endoleak rate,complications,re-intervention rate and long-term survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group(P<0.05).The stents were placed successfully in both groups.There was 1 case of slight distal stent endoleak in the observation group and 2 cases of type I endoleak in the control group during the perioperative period.Both groups were followed up for 2 years,there were 2 cases lost to follow-up in the observation group and 3 cases lost to follow-up in the control group.The stent patency rates of the two groups both were 100.00%,6 months after operation;and the incidence of complications in the observation group(4.88%,2/41)was lower than that in the control group(21.88%,7/32),P<0.05.There was no significant difference in the incidence of endoleak between the two groups(P>0.05).No one required re-intervention in the observation group during follow-up;and 4 patients in the control group underwent TEVAR again;the re-intervention rate of the observation group(0.00%,0/41)was lower than that of the control group(12.50%,4/32),P<0.05.The 2-year survival rate was 97.56%(40/41)in the observation group,and it was 90.63%(29/32)in the control group,while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Fenestrated TEVAR,in the treatment of typeⅢaortic dissection involving branch vessels,can significantly reduce the short-term complications and the re-intervention rate within 2 years after surgery.And the long-term prognosis is good.
作者 李连冲 胡振东 杨宏伟 Li Lianchong;Hu Zhendong;Yang Hongwei(Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College,Nanyang 473058,China)
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2021年第13期49-52,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 主动脉夹层 DEBAKEY分型 左锁骨下动脉 体外开窗 腔内修复术 Aortic dissection DeBakey classification Left subclavian artery Fenestration Endovascular aneurysm repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献63

  • 1董智慧,符伟国,王玉琦,郭大乔,徐欣,陈斌,蒋俊豪,杨珏,史振宇.动脉旁路辅助下胸主动脉腔内修复的探讨[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(5):280-283. 被引量:9
  • 2曾红,张建军,侯洪.36例急诊非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的误诊分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(8):509-509. 被引量:13
  • 3廖丹,王海龙.不典型症状急性心梗46例诊断分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(16):3871-3872. 被引量:17
  • 4冯希乐,张玉家,冯盂森.急性心肌梗死5例误诊原因分析[J].中国实用内科杂志,2009,19(5):302.
  • 5Wu IH,Yu HY,Liu CH,et al. Is old age a contraindieation for surgical treatment in act~te aortic dissection A demographic study of national da- tabase registry in Taiwan[J]. J Card Surg,2008,23(2) :133 -139.
  • 6Su YJ,Chang WH,Chang KS,et al. Aortic dissection in the elderly[J]. J Emerg Med,2008,35(2) :135 -138.
  • 7DE BAKEY ME, COOLEY DA. Successful resection of aneurysm of thoracic aorta and replacement by graft [ J ]. J Am Med, 1953,152(8) :673-676.
  • 8USUI A. TEVAR for type B aortic dissection in Japan [Jl. Gen- Thorac Cardiov Sur, 2014,62 (5) : 282-289.
  • 9KURATANI T. Best surgical option for arch extension of type B dissection: the endovascular approach [J]. Ann Cardiov Sur, 2014,3(3) :292.
  • 10EGGEBRECHT H, NIENABER CA, NEUHAUSER M, et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection: a metaanalysis [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 2006,27 (4) : 489-498.

共引文献78

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部