期刊文献+

103例自然流产组织的染色体微阵列结果分析 被引量:2

Chromosomal microarray analysis on 103 cases of spontaneous abortion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用染色体微阵列技术(chromosomal microarray analysis,CMA)检测自然流产组织的染色体数目和结构异常,探讨该技术的临床应用价值。方法选取自然流产组织112例,行CMA检测,分析其染色体畸变的类型。结果 CMA成功检测了103例(91.96%)流产组织,检出异常结果 57例,检出率为55.34%(57/103)。异常结果包括染色体数目异常51例,占89.47%(51/57),结构异常5例,占8.77%(5/57),父源性全基因组单亲二倍体(UPD)1例,占1.75%(1/57)。染色体数目异常以45,X最常见,其次为16-三体。≥35岁组的流产组织染色体异常检出率显著高于<35岁组(P<0.05)。结论染色体异常是导致自然流产的重要因素,而高龄是导致流产组织染色体异常发生率增加的高危因素。CMA是一种快速、有效的染色体畸变检测方法,有助于阐明自然流产的遗传学病因。 Objective To explore the numerical chromosomal abnormalities and structural chromosomal abnormalities of spontaneous abortion tissues by chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA), and to discuss the clinical application value of CMA. Methods A total of 112 cases of spontaneous abortion were recruited, and the abortion tissues were analyzed by CMA detection to search the types of chromosome aberrations. Results 103 cases(91.96%) of abortion tissues were detected successfully. The abnormal detection rate was 55.34%(57/103). Among the results, 51 cases(89.47%) were numerical abnormalities, 5 cases(8.77%) were structural abnormalities, and 1 case(1.75%) was paternal uniparental disomy(UPD). 45, X was the most common chromosome numerical aberration, followed by 16 trisomy. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in abortion tissues in the ≥35 years old group was significantly higher than that in the <35 years old group(P<0.05). Conclusion Chromosomal abnormality was an important factor leading to spontaneous abortion. Advanced age pregnancy was a high risk factor leading to the increase of chromosomal abnormalities in abortion tissues. CMA was a rapid and effective technique for detecting chromosome aberration, which helped to clarify the genetic causes of spontaneous abortion.
作者 陈伟萍 潘海滔 张涛 CHEN Weiping;PAN Haitao;ZHANG Tao(Department of Genetics,Shaoxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital,Shaoxing,Zhejiang 312000,China)
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2021年第3期392-394,共3页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(81701522) 浙江省医药卫生科研基金(2019KY230)。
关键词 流产组织 染色体微阵列分析 染色体数目异常 染色体结构异常 abortion tissue chromosomal microarray analysis numerical abnormality chromosome structural abnormality
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetie diagnosis of constitutional disorders [ J ].Nature genetics, 2007, 39 (7 Suppl) : $48-54. DOI: 10. 1038/ ng2092.
  • 2Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies [J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2010, 86(5): 749-764. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ajhg. 2010.04. 006.
  • 3Dawson AJ, Chernos J, McGowan-]ordan J, et al. CCMG guidelines : prenatal and postnatal diagnostic testing for uniparental disomy[J]. Clin Genet, 2011, 79(2): 118-124. DOI: 10. 1111/j. 1399-0004. 2010. 01547. x.
  • 4Palmer EE, Peters GB, Mowat D. Chromosome microarray in Australia: a guide for paediatriciansE J~. J Paediatr Child Health, 2012, 48 (2): E59-67. DOI: 10. llll/j. 1440-1754. 2011. 02081. x.
  • 5Manning M, Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities [J]. Genet Med, 2010, 12 ( 11 ) : 742-745. DOI: 10. 1097/GIM. 0b013e3181tSbaad.
  • 6Cooley LD, Lebo M, Li MM, et al. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics technical standards and guidelines: microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in neoplastic disorders[J]. Genet Med, 2013, 15(6): 484494. DOI: 10. 1038/~im. 2013.49.
  • 7Baldwin EL, Lee JY, Blake DM, et al. Enhanced detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances using a targeted plus whole genome oligonucleotide microarray [ J]. Genet Med, 2008, 10 (6) : 415-429. DOI: 10. 1097/GIM. 0b013e318177015c.
  • 8Thuresson AC, Bondeson ML, Edeby C, et al. Whole-genome array-CGH for detection of submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances in children with mental retardation [ J]. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2007, 118(1) : 1-7. DOI: 10. 1159/000106434.
  • 9Lu XY, Phung MT, Shaw CA, et al. Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 122(6) : 1310-1318. DOI: 10. 1542/peds. 2008-0297.
  • 10Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, et al. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. [ J ]. Genet Med, 2011, 13 (7) : 680-685. DOI: 10. 1097/GIM. 0bO13e3182217a3a.

共引文献65

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部