期刊文献+

New Developments in Quality Control of Forensic Science in China

原文传递
导出
摘要 Forensic science has advanced rapidly in China in recent years,with the number of forensic cases increasing in leaps and bounds.Forensicevidence has become indispensable in judicial trials.With the introduction of anti‑trial strategy in the reforms of the trial‑centered litigationsystem,quality of forensic evidence has become a focus of cross‑examinations.Since 2015,product quality in numerous areas has been improvedby standardization,and thus,China has focused on developing a national standardization strategy.Thus,standardization is also increasingin the field of forensic science.This study examines the growth in both the number and the type of forensic science cases in China over thepast 10 years and also the deep qualitative cross‑examination brought by the rise of the expert assessor policy toward forensic conclusions intrial.We also examine the progress of forensic science standardization in the context of the quality triangle of forensic science,as well as thestructure of standardization in forensic science,basic research on forensic science,and measures designed to strengthen education,training,and communication with the judicial profession.These issues are of vital importance in relation to quality control in forensic science.
作者 Xu Wang He Yuan
出处 《Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine》 2019年第2期118-122,共5页 法庭科学与法医学杂志(英文)
基金 This study was funded by the Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Project of Ministry of Education(18YJA820018) Open Research Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of on-site Material Evidence(2017XCWZK19).
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1KAYE,D.H.The Double Helix and the Law of Evidence. . 2010
  • 2ALLEN,R.J,NAFISI,E.Daubert and Its Discontents. Brooklyn L.Rev . 2010
  • 3FAIGMAN,D.L,SAKS,M.J,SANDERS,J,CHENG,E.K.Modern Scientific Evidence. .
  • 4Standards,Statistics and Research Methods. . 2008
  • 5GIANNELLI,P.C.Daubert and Forensic Science:The Pitfalls of Law Enforcement Control of Of Scientific Research. Un.of Illinois L.Rev . 2011
  • 6HAACK,S.Federal Philosophy of Science:A Deconstruction–And A Reconstruction. NYU J.Law&Lib . 2010
  • 7HAACK,S.Irreconciliable Differences?The Troubled Marriage of Science and Law. Law&Cont.Probl . 2009
  • 8KAYE,D.H.Probability,Individualization,and Uniqueness in Forensic Science Evidence:Listening to the Academics. Brooklyn L.Rev . 2012
  • 9LUKE,A.Employment Discrimination Litigation:Social Science Evidence and a Solution for The Problem of Presumptions. Temple J.of Science,Techn.&Law . 2010
  • 10MNOOKIN,J.L.The Courts,the NAS,and the Future of Forensic Science. Brooklyn L.Rev . 2010

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部