期刊文献+

基于手机和纸笔调查的中文版乳腺癌自我效能感量表测量等价性研究 被引量:5

Measurement Invariance of Chinese Version of Breast Cancer Self-efficacy Survivors between Smartphone-based and Paper-based Data Collection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验基于手机调查和纸笔调查的中文版乳腺癌自我效能感量表是否具备测量等价性。方法通过方便抽样,采用一般资料问卷及中文版乳腺癌自我效能感量表对上海某三级甲等医院乳腺中心就诊的302例乳腺癌患者进行调查,其中145例使用手机调查,157例使用纸笔调查。采用多组验证性因子分析检验量表采用不同测量方式的测量等价性。结果基线模型、形态等价模型、单位等价模型及尺度等价模型的各项模型拟合指标均达到统计学要求,提示模型拟合良好。结论乳腺癌自我效能感量表在2种测量方式下具备强测量等价性,研究者可根据需要选择适合的方式进行数据收集并进行数据合并。 Objective To examine the measurement invariance of Chinese version of Breast Cancer Self-efficacy Survivors between smartphone-based and paper-based data collection.Methods By convenience sampling,302 breast cancer patients of a tertiary grade A hospital in Shanghai were investigated by a self-designed general information questionnaire and Chinese version of Breast Cancer Self-efficacy Survivors,of which 145 cases were investigated by smartphone and 157 by paper.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the measurement invariance.Result All statistical indices/indicators of baseline model,configural invariance model,metric invariance model,and scalar invariance model had met the statistical requirements,which indicated good model fit.Conclusion The findings show that the Chinese version of Breast Cancer Self-Efficacy Survivors is of strong measurement invariance.Researchers could choose proper way to collect and merge the data based on the needs.
作者 吴傅蕾 袁晓玲 袁长蓉 WU Fu-lei;YUAN Xiao-ling;YUAN Chang-rong(School of Nursing,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;School of Nursing,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China)
出处 《护理学报》 北大核心 2021年第16期32-36,共5页 Journal of Nursing(China)
基金 复旦大学复星护理科研基金(FNF202006)。
关键词 测量等价性 多组验证性因子分析 自我效能感 乳腺癌 measurement invariance multi-group confirmatory factor analysis self-efficacy breast cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献83

  • 1侯杰泰,成子娟.结构方程模型的应用及分析策略[J].心理学探新,1999,19(1):54-59. 被引量:90
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3779
  • 3程开明.结构方程模型的特点及应用[J].统计与决策,2006,22(10):22-25. 被引量:145
  • 4秦浩,陈景武.结构方程模型原理及其应用注意事项[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(4):367-369. 被引量:52
  • 5[1]Drasgow F. Biased test items and differential validity. Psychological Bulletin,1982, 92: 526~531
  • 6[2]Bobko P, Kehoe J F. On the fair use of bias: a comment on Drasgow. Psychology Bulletin, 1983, 93: 604~608
  • 7[3]Drasgow F. Scrutinizing psychological tests: measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95: 34~135
  • 8[4]Drasgow F. Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied psychology, 1987, 72: 19~29
  • 9[5]Byrne B M, Shavelson R J, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures:the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1989,105: 456~466
  • 10[6]Drasgow F, Kanfer R. Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70: 662~680

共引文献1282

同被引文献44

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部