期刊文献+

双人合作go/no-go任务在评估人际关系质量的研究

Study of Dual-player Cooperative Go/no-go Task in Evaluating Interpersonal Relationship Quality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用双人合作go/no-go任务范式,探究其在人际关系质量评估中的作用,揭示该任务用于评估群体人际关系质量的潜在价值。方法招募志愿者朋友组76对,陌生人组23对,测量情绪表达及人际关系质量问卷指标,随后成对完成双人合作go/no-go任务,记录相应的同步率和反应时指标。结果朋友组的go试次反应时差显著低于陌生人组(P<0.01);go试次反应时差和积极情绪表达与人际关系质量存在显著的相关关系(P<0.01);go试次同步率、go同步试次反应时差和积极情绪表达强度与人际关系质量存在显著的相关关系(P<0.05);进一步通过线性回归分析发现go试次同步率、go试次反应时差和积极情绪表达可以共同预测人际关系质量(P<0.001)。结论双人合作go/no-go任务能够有效评估人际关系质量,且构建的线性回归模型可反映人际关系的紧密程度。 Objective The dual-player cooperative go/no-go task was applied to explore its role in evalua-ting the interpersonal relationship quality,and to reveal the potential value of the task for evaluating interpersonal relationship quality in groups.Methods The study recruited 76 pairs of participants in friends and 23 pairs in strangers.The emotional expressivity and interpersonal relationship quality questionnaire were measured,then each pair completed the dual-player cooperative go/no-go task,and the corresponding synchronization rate and reaction time were recorded.Results The response time difference of go trial in the friend group was significantly lower than that of the stranger group(P<0.01);the response time difference of go trials and positive emotion expressivity were significantly re-lated to the interpersonal quality(P<0.01);the synchronization rate of go trials and the response time difference of go synchronization trials and the positive emotion expressivity intensity were signifi-cantly related to the interpersonal relationship quality(P<0.05).Further linear regression analysis found that the synchronization rate of go trials,the response time difference of go trials,and the posi-tive emotion expressivity can significantly predict the interpersonal relationship quality(P<0.001).Conclusion The dual-player cooperative go/no-go task can effectively estimate the interpersonal rela-tionship quality,and the constructed linear regression model of task performance related indicators and emotional expressivity questionnaire-related indicators can reflect the closeness of interpersonal re-lationship.
作者 余凯 李成 张玉麟 赵国朕 Yu Kai;Li Cheng;Zhang Yulin;Zhao Guozhen(Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;Department of Psychology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;School of Basic Sciences for Aviation,Naval Aviation University,Yantai Shandong 264001,China)
出处 《航天医学与医学工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第5期367-374,共8页 Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31771226) 创新人才推进计划-青年科技新星项目(2020KJXX-024)。
关键词 双人合作go/no-go任务 人际关系质量 群体 情绪表达 dual-player cooperative go/no-go task interpersonal relationship quality group emotion expressivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1刘贤臣,戴郑生,唐茂芹,陈琨,胡蕾,王爱祯.抑郁自评量表(SDS)医学生测查结果的因子分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2(3):151-154. 被引量:50
  • 2王力,柳恒超,李中权,杜卫.情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(6):503-505. 被引量:224
  • 3Gross J J, John OP. Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Indi- vidual Differences, 1995, 19(4): 555-568.
  • 4Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 2002, 39:281-291.
  • 5Gray SM. Heatherington L. The importance of social context in the facilitation of emotional expression in man. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2003, 22(3): 294-314.
  • 6Kring AM, Smith DA, Neale JM. Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: development and validation of the emotional expressivity scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(5): 934-949.
  • 7Friedman HS, Prince LM, Riggio RE, DiMatteo MR. Under- standing and assessing nonverbal expressiveness: The affec- tive communication Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39(2): 333-351.
  • 8Kring LA, Emmons RA. Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psyhcology, 1990, 58:867-877.
  • 9Halberstadt AG, Cassidy J, Stifler CA, et al. Self-express- iveness within the family context: Psychometric support for a new measure. Psychological Assessment, 1995, 7:93-103.
  • 10Diener E, Smith H, Fujita F. The personality structure of af- fect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 69 (1): 130-141.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部