期刊文献+

维持性血液透析患者认知衰弱的现状及影响因素分析 被引量:11

Analysis on current status and influencing factors of cognitive frailty in Maintenance Hemodialysis patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:调查维持性血液透析患者认知衰弱现状,并分析其影响因素。方法:选取连云港市3所医院共452例维持性血液透析患者为研究对象,采用衰弱表型、简易精神状态检查量表及临床痴呆评定量表进行认知衰弱的筛查,收集相关临床资料,并分析患者认知衰弱的影响因素。结果:93例(20.6%)患者存在认知衰弱,Logistic回归分析结果显示,高龄、女性、腰围较大、存在营养不良风险和抑郁是认知衰弱的危险因素,较高的文化程度和血清肌酐水平是认知衰弱的保护因素(P<0.05)。结论:维持性血液透析患者认知衰弱的发生率较高,医护人员应加强对该人群的关注,及早识别并采取针对性的干预措施。 Objective:To investigate the prevalence of cognitive frailty in Maintenance Hemodialysis patients and to analyze the influencing factors.Methods:A total of 452 Maintenance Hemodialysis patients in 3 hospitals of Lianyungang were selected as the study subjects.The Frailty Phenotype,Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating were used to screen for cognitive frailty.The relevant clinical data were collected,and the influencing factors of cognitive frailty were analyzed.Results:Ninety-three patients(20.6%)had cognitive frailty.Logistic regression analysis showed that advanced age,female,larger waist circumference,malnutrition and depression were risk factors for cognitive frailty.Higher education level and serum creatinine level were protective factors for cognitive frailty(P<0.05).Conclusion:The prevalence of cognitive frailty in Maintenance Hemodialysis patients is high.Medical staff should pay more attention to this population,identify early and take targeted intervention.
作者 陈管洁 张海林 尹丽霞 杜晓菊 张永萍 CHEN Guanjie;ZHANG Hailin;YIN Lixia;DU Xiaoju;ZHANG Yongping(Department of Hemopurification Center,The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University,Jiangsu province,222000,China;不详)
出处 《中国护理管理》 CSCD 2021年第8期1179-1185,共7页 Chinese Nursing Management
基金 连云港市妇幼健康科研项目(F202001)。
关键词 维持性血液透析 认知衰弱 影响因素 Maintenance Hemodialysis cognitive frailty influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1李可基,张宝慧.国际组织和各国政府关于运动促进健康政策及措施的分析与比较[J].体育科学,2003,23(1):91-95. 被引量:37
  • 2郝燕萍,刘雪琴.修订版跌倒效能量表在我国老年人群中的测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(1):19-21. 被引量:214
  • 3Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman AE, et al. Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults. Int J Epidemiol,1996,25∶153-159.
  • 4Bassett DR. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity.Res Q Exerc Sport,2000,71(suppl)∶s30-s36.
  • 5Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, et al. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1993,25∶81-91.
  • 6Sobngwi E, Mbanya JC, Unwin NC, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies in Sub-Saharal Africa.Int J Epidemiol,2001,30∶1361-1368.
  • 7Taylor CB, Coffey T, Berra K, et al. Seven-day activity and self-report compared to direct measure of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol,1984,120∶818-824.
  • 8Dishman RK, Steinhardt M. Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d recall of physical activity in college students. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1988,20∶14-25.
  • 9US Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity &amp; Health,1996.
  • 10Laporte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Rep,1985,100∶131-146.

共引文献542

同被引文献160

引证文献11

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部