期刊文献+

益生菌干预对婴儿肠道微生态及生长发育的影响 被引量:2

Effects of probiotic intervention on intestinal microecology and growth of infants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究早期益生菌干预对婴儿肠道微生态建立及生长发育的影响。方法观察并比较母乳喂养组72例、单纯人工喂养组84例和益生菌干预组84例足月新生儿干预后第3天、第1月及第6月粪便标本中双歧杆菌、大肠杆菌水平,双歧杆菌与大肠杆菌的数量比值(B/E值)及生长发育指标。结果母乳喂养组、益生菌干预组干预后第3天、第1月及第6月的粪便双歧杆菌定量结果、粪便B/E比值均高于同期单纯人工喂养组,此2组干预后第3天和第1月的粪便大肠杆菌定量结果均低于同期单纯人工喂养组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后第6月,母乳喂养组、益生菌干预组的身长和神经发育商结果均高于单纯人工喂养组,肥胖率均低于单纯人工喂养组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肠道微生态的稳态对婴儿的生长发育较为关键,相较于单纯人工喂养,益生菌干预更有助于婴儿肠道微生态的建立和生长发育。 Objective To study the effects of an early probiotic intervention on the establishment of intestinal microecology as well as the growth of infants.Methods The levels of Bifidobacterium and Escherichia col(E.coli),the number ratio of Bifidobacterium to Escherichia coli(B/E),and growth indicators in fecal specimens on the third day,first month and sixth months after intervention were observed and compared in 72 cases in the breastfeeding group,84 cases in the artificial feeding group and 84 full-term newborns in the probiotic intervention group.Results The quantitative results of fecal Bifidobacterium and B/E ratio of the breastfeeding group and the probiotic intervention group at the third day,first month and sixth month after intervention were higher than the artificial feeding group during the same period,and the quantitative results of fecal E.coli of the two groups at the third day and first month after intervention were lower than in the artificial feeding group during the same period,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).At the sixth month post-intervention,the breastfeeding group and the probiotic intervention group both had higher length and neurodevelopmental quotient results than the artificial feeding group,and lower obesity rates,all with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusions The homeostasis of the intestinal microecology is critical to the growth of infants.Compared with artificial feeding,probiotic intervention is more helpful for the establishment of intestinal microecology and infants’growth and development.
作者 方晓丹 王有成 王爱珍 钱颖 FANG Xiaodan;WANG Youcheng;WANG Aizhen;QIAN Ying(Department of Pediatrics,Jinhua People's Hospital,Jinhua 321000,China)
出处 《健康研究》 CAS 2021年第4期446-449,共4页 Health Research
基金 金华市科技局项目(2019-4-043)。
关键词 益生菌 肠道微生态 生长发育 健康 probiotics intestinal microecology growth and development health
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1卢建平,杨志伟,舒明耀,苏林雁.儿童孤独症量表评定的信度、效度分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2004,14(13):119-121. 被引量:142
  • 2李建华,钟建民,蔡兰云,陈勇,周末芝.三种儿童孤独症行为评定量表临床应用比较[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2005,7(1):59-62. 被引量:65
  • 3史惟.儿童认知运动疗法[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(10):853-854. 被引量:3
  • 4黄真,李明.发育中婴幼儿的运动评估-Alberta婴儿运动量表[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009 :163-166.
  • 5Fleuren KM,Smit LS,Stijnen T,et al. New reference valuesfor the Alberta Infant Motor Scale need to be established[J].Aeta Paediatr ,2007 ,96(3) :424-427.
  • 6Jeng SF,Yau KI,Chenal. Alberta Infant Motor Scalereliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Tai-wan[J]. Phys TTier,2000,80(2) : 168-178.
  • 7Campos D, Santos DC, Goncalves VM, et al. Agreement be-tween scales for screening and diagnosis of motor develop-ment at 6 months[J]. J Pediatr (Rio J ) , 2006 ,82 :470-474.
  • 8Snyder P, Eason JM,Philibert D, et al. Concurrent validityand reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants atdual risk for motor delays [ J]. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr,2008,28(3):267-282.
  • 9Almeida KM,Dutra MV’Mello RR,er al. Concurrent validityand reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in prematureinfants[J]. J Pediatr CRio J ),2008,84(5) : 442-448.
  • 10Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing[J]. Nature, 2010, 464 (7285) : 59-65.

共引文献99

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部