期刊文献+

免疫规划循证决策的国内外进展与展望 被引量:2

International and Chinese evidence-based decision making for immunization policy:progress and prospects
原文传递
导出
摘要 免疫规划循证决策是各国卫生工作的重要内容。国家免疫规划专家咨询组织(National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups,NITAG)是专门成立的践行循证决策的独立组织,由多学科专家组成,负责就疫苗接种特定主题收集、整理、分析和评估相关证据,向政府卫生部门提供循证决策建议。世界卫生组织(World Health Organization,WHO)建议各国均成立NITAG,以确保政府部门出台疫苗相关公共政策的决策过程具有循证依据支持。本文介绍了WHO免疫战略专家咨询组织和不同国家NITAG的免疫规划循证决策进展和实践经验、中国免疫规划专家咨询组织的发展历程以及2017年成立的国家免疫规划专家咨询委员会和国家免疫规划技术工作组的工作机制、进展和展望。 Evidence-based decision-making for immunization policy is a high priority for global health.National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups(NITAGs)are independent technical advisory bodies developed specifically for this purpose.NITAGs are multidisciplinary groups of national experts responsible for collecting,reviewing,and assessing scientific evidence on specific vaccine-related topics.They provide independent,evidence-informed policy-related recommendations to health authorities.The World Health Organization(WHO)has repeatedly recommended that countries establish NITAGs so that governments are able to develop logical and evidence-based immunization policy.In this paper,we review the practices of WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization(SAGE),NITAGs in different countries,and China’s historic NITAGs.We then describe working mechanisms,progress,and future plans of China’s recently(in 2017)established new NITAG,the National Immunization Advisory Committee,and its technical working groups.
作者 马超 安志杰 李军宏 王亚敏 尹遵栋 冯子健 Ma Chao;An Zhijie;Li Junhong;Wang Yamin;Yin Zundong;Feng Zijian(National Immunization Program,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 100050,China)
出处 《中国疫苗和免疫》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期479-484,共6页 Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization
关键词 免疫规划 循证决策 国家免疫规划专家咨询组织 Immunization program Evidence-based policy making National Immunization Technical Advisory Group
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1梁晓峰,乌正赉.免疫规划30年保障健康亿万人[J].中华预防医学杂志,2008,42(S01):4-6. 被引量:7
  • 2殷大鹏,王华庆,樊春祥,周玉清,梁晓峰.我国无细胞百白破疫苗纳入免疫规划可行性探讨[J].中国公共卫生管理,2007,23(3):249-250. 被引量:11
  • 3威廉·邓恩.公共政策分析导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 4Strategic Policy Making Team Cabinet Office. Profes-sional Policy Making for the Twenty -first Century. http://dera. Joe. ac. uk/6320/.
  • 5Andrew Wyatt. Evidence - based Policy Making. The View From A Center. Public Policy and Administration, 2002(03).
  • 6Rudd.K. Address to Heads of Agencies and Members of Senior Executive Service. http://www. apsc. gov. au/media/rudd300408, htm.
  • 7Carolyn J. Heinrich. Evidence-based Policy and Performance Management. Challenges and Prospects in Two Parallel Movements. The American Review of Public Administration, 2007 (03).
  • 8Sanderson. Iran, Making Sense of ' What works' : Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Ration ality?. Public Policy and Administration, 2002(03).
  • 9Davies. PT. What is Evidence - based Education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 1999(03).
  • 10Sandria Tennant, Anthony Clayton. The Politics of Infrastructural Projects: A Case for Evidence-based Policy Making. International Journal of Public Administration, 2002(13).

共引文献215

同被引文献21

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部