摘要
行政审批制度改革中,完善行政审批期限制度成为提高行政效能的关键点。行政审批期限可以分为承诺期限和法定期限:囿于受案范围和审查强度的限制,承诺期限在实践中并没有发挥其应有的功用;具有直接制裁效果的法定期限不仅难以提升权利人法安定性保障,对行政审批程序的拟制可能危及公共利益,也给行政监管带来挑战。因此,行政审批期限制度创新应当以法治思维和实效观察为导向。
In the reform of the administrative examination and approval system,the Approval Period system has become the key to improving administrative efficiency.The administrative approval period can be divided into a commitment period and a statutory period:limited by the scope of the case and the intensity of the review,the commitment period does not play its due function in practice;the legal period with direct sanctions is not only lack of legal certainty for right holder,the fiction of the administrative examination and approval procedures may endanger the public interest,but also bring challenges to administrative supervision.The innovation of the administrative examination and approval period system should be guided by legal thinking and observation of actual effects.
作者
张冬阳
Zhang Dongyang(School of Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249)
出处
《中国行政管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第7期52-57,共6页
Chinese Public Administration
基金
中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划“优化营商环境的行政法治保障创新团队”(编号:20CXTD01)
中国政法大学科研创新年度青年项目“道路交通信号的法律属性和权利救济问题研究”(编号:19ZFQ82007)。