亲密关系付出感问卷的编制及信效度检验

Development and Validation of Sense of Giving Questionnaire in Intimate Relationships

目的:探索中国文化背景下亲密关系付出感的概念和结构,编制适用于亲密关系研究的付出感问卷并检验其信效度。方法:结合文献检索、小组访谈和问卷调查等多种方式形成初始问卷;选择具有三个月以上恋爱经历的成年人为被试,对349名被试的问卷进行项目分析和探索性因素分析;对378名被试的问卷进行验证性因素分析和信效度检验。结果:亲密关系付出感问卷包含认知付出、情感付出、行为付出3个维度,共计14个项目。问卷三因素结构模型的拟合指数良好,χ^(2)/df=2.811, SRMR=0.044, RMSEA=0.069, CFI=0.942, IFI=0.940, TLI=0.926, GFI=0.925;总问卷与各维度的内部一致性信度在0.781~0.906之间,1个月后对143名被试的重测信度在0.770~0.897之间;付出感问卷与投资模型量表中的满意度、投入度、承诺正相关(r=0.458~0.737, P<0.01),与替代性负相关(r=-0.233~-0.277, P<0.01)。结论:亲密关系付出感问卷的信度和效度良好,可用于亲密关系相关研究中。

Objective: Based on the background of Chinese culture, Sense of Giving Questionnaire(SGQ) in intimate relationships was developed and its reliability and validity were examined. Methods: Through literatures review, interviews and open questionnaires, the initial questionnaire was formed. We chose adults who have been dating for more than three months as participants, among whom 349 participants were used in item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. The final questionnaire was formed by taking 378 participants as samples to conduct reliability and validity test. Results: The SGQ consisted of 14 items, including 3 dimensions: cognitive giving, emotional giving and behavioral giving. The results of CFA showed that the questionnaire fitted the data with well construct validity(χ^(2)/df=2.811, SRMR=0.044, RMSEA=0.069, CFI=0.942, IFI=0.940, TLI=0.926, GFI=0.925). The internal consistency reliabilities of SGQ and its sub-dimensions were between 0.781 and 0.906, and the test-retest reliabilities for 143 participants after one month were between 0.770 and 0.897.The SGQ was positively correlated with satisfaction, investment, and commitment(r=0.458 to 0.737, P<0.01) and negatively correlated with alternative(r=-0.233 to-0.277, P<0.01) in the Investment Model Scale Chinese Revised(IMS-CR). Conclusion: The SGQ has satisfactory validity and reliability, which can be used in used in intimacy-related research.