期刊文献+

不同热源模型对选区激光熔化18Ni300温度场计算结果的影响 被引量:18

Effect of Different Heat-Source Models on Calculated Temperature Field of Selective Laser Melted 18Ni300
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了明确不同热源模型对选区激光熔化18Ni300成形过程温度场模拟计算的适用性,使用ANSYS APDL对单层单道激光熔化成形过程进行了温度场计算,比较了高斯面热源和双椭球热源两种热源模型计算的18Ni300金属粉末熔道的温度场和熔池尺寸。结果表明,双椭球热源模型计算结果的准确性优于高斯面热源模型的计算结果,与试验结果吻合良好。在选区激光熔化过程中,熔池尺寸不仅与激光功率、扫描速度有关,还与激光能量在粉末中的扩散有关。扫描速度对熔池宽度和深度的影响是非线性的。当激光线能量密度相同时,高激光功率和高扫描速度下获得的熔池的深度和宽度大于低功率和低扫描速度下获得的。 Objective Heat-source models play a key role in the numerical simulation of the selective laser melting process.To examine the applicability of the double ellipsoid and Gaussian surface heat-source models on simulation,the temperature field of a single-pass selective laser melted 18 Ni300 metal powder was calculated using the two heat-source models and compared with experimental data.Methods The ANSYS APDL commercial software was used to establish a three-dimensional finite element model and to simulate the temperature field of the selective laser melting process.The double ellipsoid and Gaussian surface heat-source models were defined and applied to an 18 Ni300 metal powder.Single-pass selective laser melted18 Ni300 samples were fabricated using EOS M290 by applying different laser power levels and scanning speeds.The sample widths were measured using scanning electron microscopy to determine the width of molten pools.In the calculated temperature fields,the sizes of molten pools of the single-pass selective laser melted 18 Ni300 were analyzed and compared with experimental results.Results and Discussions The shapes of the temperature field distribution calculated using the double ellipsoid and the Gaussian surface heat-source models are all ellipsoidal after applying a 210 Wlaser power and a 1000 mm/s scanning speed.However,their width,length,and trail calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model are larger than those calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model(Fig.3).This is due to the difference in the energy distribution of the two heat-source models.In the Gaussian surface heat-source model,the energy is distributed on the surface of the powder layer,whereas in the double ellipsoid heat-source model,the energy is distributed deep into the powder layer.Moreover,the maximum temperature calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model is much higher than that calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model.This indicates that the diffusion speed of heat through the powder layer is faster than that through the surrounding environment,resulting in a lower maximum calculated temperature of the molten pool surface using the double ellipsoid heatsource model.Along with the laser scanning,the peak temperature calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model is lower than that calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model and fluctuates significantly with a rising trend.In contrast,the peak temperature calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model is higher and fluctuates slightly with small variations(Fig.4).The sizes of the molten pools calculated by applying a 210 Wlaser power and a 1000 mm/s scanning speed using the two heat-source models show that the width of the molten pool calculated using the Gaussian surface heatsource model is larger than that calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model.In contrast,the length and depth of the molten pool calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model are larger than those calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model(Fig.5).However,under different processing parameters,the calculated sizes of the molten pools using the two models exhibit different trends.Although the calculated width and depth of the molten pool using the two heat-source models decrease as the scanning speed increases(for the same laser power),the decreasing trend of the results calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model is slower than that calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model(Fig.6).It is confirmed that the depth of the molten pool calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model is larger than that calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model.The width of the molten pool is not only related to the laser power and scanning speed,but also to the diffusion of the laser energy in the powder.Since the Gaussian surface heat-source model does not take into account the energy diffusion in the powder,the width of the molten pool calculated using the Gaussian surface heat-source model is smaller than that calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model when the scanning speed is low,but it is larger when the scanning speed is high.The scanning speed has an exponential rather than linear effect on the width and depth of the molten pool.As a result,the width and depth of the molten pools are not the same under the same laser energy density.The width and depth of the molten pools obtained using high laser power and high scanning speed are larger than those obtained using low laser power and low scanning speed,although the same laser energy density was used.The experimental results confirm that the simulation results obtained using the double ellipsoid heat-source model are more accurate and reliable than those obtained using the Gaussian surface heat-source model in the simulation of the 18 Ni300 selective laser melting process(Fig.8).Conclusions The double ellipsoid heat-source model takes into account the laser energy diffusion in the powder,and its calculated-results accuracy is better than that of the Gaussian surface heat-source model in the simulation of the 18 Ni300 selective laser melting process.Thus,the double ellipsoid heat-source can describe the temperature field evolution and moten pool size during the selective laser melting process better than the Gaussian surface heatsource model.The width of the molten pool is not only related to the laser power and scanning speed,but also to the laser energy diffusion in the powder.The effect of the scanning speed on the width and depth of the molten pool is nonlinear.Under the same laser energy density,the depth and width of the molten pool obtained using high laser power and high scanning speed are larger.The width calculated using the double ellipsoid heat-source model is in good agreement with the experimental data,thus providing a basis for the optimization of the selective laser melting process.
作者 罗心磊 刘美红 黎振华 李淮阳 申继标 Luo Xinlei;Liu Meihong;Li Zhenhua;Li Huaiyang;Shen Jibiao(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kuming,Yunnan 650500,China;School of Materials Science and Engineering,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kuming,Yunnan 650500,China)
出处 《中国激光》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第14期46-56,共11页 Chinese Journal of Lasers
基金 国家自然科学基金(51961017) 云南省重点研发计划(2018BA064) 云南省基础研究重点项目202101AS070017。
关键词 激光技术 温度场 选区激光熔化 双椭球热源 高斯面热源 熔池尺寸 laser technique temperature field selective laser melting double ellipsoid heat source Gaussian surface heat source molten pool size
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献75

  • 1沈显峰,王洋,姚进,杨家林.直接金属选区激光多道烧结温度场有限元模拟[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2005,37(1):47-51. 被引量:18
  • 2席明哲,虞钢.连续移动三维瞬态激光熔池温度场数值模拟[J].中国激光,2004,31(12):1527-1532. 被引量:73
  • 3史晓亮,邵刚勤,段兴龙,杨华,王天国.热压烧结制备高密度钨铜合金[J].机械工程材料,2007,31(3):37-39. 被引量:10
  • 4Williams J D, Deckard C R. Advances in Molding the Effects of Selected Parameters on the SLS Process. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 1998, 4(2): 90-100.
  • 5Agarwala M, Bourell D, Beaman J, et al. Direct Selective Laser Sintering of Metals. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 1995, 1 (1): 26-36.
  • 6Siu W W M, Lee S H K. Effective Conductivity Computation of a Packed Bed Using Constriction Resistance and Contact Angle Effects. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2000,43:3917-3924.
  • 7Tolochko N K,Laoui T,Khlopkov Y V, et al. Absorptance of Powder Materials Suitable for Laser Sintering. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2002, 16(3): 155-160.
  • 8Zhu H H, Lu L,Fuh J Y H. Influence of Binder's Liquid Volume Fraction on Direct Laser Sintering of Metallic Powder. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2004, 371:170-177.
  • 9Simchi A,Pohl H. Effects of Laser Sintering Processing Parameters on the Microstructure and Densification of Iron Powder. Materials and Engineering A, 2003. 359:119-128.
  • 10Das S,Beaman J J,Wohlert M,et al.Direct Laser Frceform Fabrication of High Performance Metal Components .Rapid Prototyping Journal,1998,4(3):112-117.

共引文献118

同被引文献170

引证文献18

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部