期刊文献+

论企业专利侵权诉讼中的多重博弈结构与行为选择

Discussion on Multiple Game Structure and Behavior Selection in Enterprise Patent Infringement Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前在我国的专利侵权诉讼制度中,专利侵权诉讼存在被滥用的风险。滥诉方、遭受滥诉的企业、法院作为个体单元,共同构成复杂诉讼关系的连接点,三者的关系呈现为一种复合博弈结构,正是这种结构下的多重博弈关系影响着诉讼中个体的策略选择。法院对专利侵权诉讼滥用行为规制的缺失,构成了对专利侵权诉讼滥用现象的多重诱导,导致当事人双方诉讼利益的失衡,专利侵权诉讼被异化为打击竞争对手、牟取不当利益的工具。 In China's current patent infringement litigation system,there is a risk of abuse of patent infringement litigation.The abuser of litigation,the enterprise suffering from abusive litigation,and the court as individual units constitute the connection point of the complex litigation relationship.The relationship between the three appears as a compound game structure.It is the multiple game relationship under this structure that affects individual strategic choices in the litigation.The lack of the court's regulation of abusive behavior in patent infringement litigation constitutes multiple inducements to the abuse of patent infringement litigation,leading to an imbalance in the litigation interests of both parties,and patent infringement litigation has been alienated as a tool to combat competitors and seek improper benefi ts.
作者 彭祥飞 PENG Xiangfei(Shanghai International Intellectual Property Institute,Tongji University)
出处 《商展经济》 2021年第17期76-78,共3页 Trade Fair Economy
关键词 专利侵权诉讼 诉讼滥用 多重博弈 行为选择 滥诉治理 patent infringement litigation litigation abuse multiple games behavior selection regulation of the abuse of litigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献43

  • 1白绿铉.督促程序比较研究——我国督促程序立法的法理评析[J].中国法学,1995(4):75-84. 被引量:41
  • 2李维安,吴德胜,徐皓.网上交易中的声誉机制——来自淘宝网的证据[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(5):36-46. 被引量:164
  • 3吴超鹏和唐药,2015,《知识产权保护与产权性质对企业创新影响的实证研究》[D],厦门大学管理学院财务系工作论文.
  • 4Bloom N. , S. Bond and J. V. Reenen. 2007. "Uncertainty and Investment Dynamics", The Review of Economic[K] Studies, 74(2) : 391 -415.
  • 5Bradley D. J. , I. Kim and X. Tian. 2016. "Do Unions Affect Innovation.'?" ,Management Science,1 -21.
  • 6Chemmanur T. J. and X. Tian. 2013. "Do Anti- Takeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation'?.", SSRN Working Paper, No. 1572219.
  • 7Dai L. L. , R. Shen and B. H. Zhang. 2015. "The Dark Side of News Coverage: Evidence from Corporate Innovation", CICF Meetings.
  • 8He J. J. and X. Tian. 2013. "The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation", Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3) : 856-878.
  • 9Hsu P. H. , X. Tian and Y. Xu. 2014. "Financial Development and Innovation Financial Economics, 112(1) : 116-135.
  • 10Long X. N. and J. Wang. 2015. "Judicial Local Protectionism in China lmernational Review of Law and Economics, 42 : 48 - 59. Cross - Country Evidence", Journal of An Empirical Study of IP Cases ",.

共引文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部