期刊文献+

侵权责任:徘徊在债与责任之间的立法价值 被引量:7

Tort Liability:Legislative Value Hovering between Debt and Liability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 侵权责任在债与责任之间徘徊,是对《民法典》规定侵权责任法律属性的概括,即确认侵权责任既是侵权之债,又是民事责任,具有双重属性,因而在立法上,并未将侵权之债规定在合同编或者之后,而是作为第七编规定在《民法典》最后一编,作为民事权利保护法。立法者将侵权责任徘徊在债与责任之间体现了重要的立法价值,一是实现侵权损害赔偿回归债法传统的目的,二是科学建构民事权利保护方法的请求权体系,三是保持债法规则的整体性和通用性,四是确认侵权责任法的基本功能是民事权利保护法。其最基本的价值,就在于通过实现《民法典》的“总-分-总”结构,充分发挥侵权责任保护民事权利的职能作用,更好地保护好民事主体的民事权益。 Tort liability hovers between debt and liability,which is a summary of the legal attributes of tort liability under the Civil Code.That is,it confirms that tort liability has a dual attribute,being both a debt in tort and a civil liability.Thus,in the legislation,the tort liability is not provided in the Civil Code,either in or after the contract part,but in the last part of the Civil Code,i.e.,Title VII,as the law protecting civil rights.The legislator hovering the tort liability between debt and liability reflects the important legislative value.The first is to realize the purpose of returning tort damages to the tradition of debt law,the second is to scientifically construct the claim system of civil rights protection methods,the third is to maintain the integrity and universality of the rules of debt law,and the fourth is to confirm the basic function of tort liability law as the law of civil rights protection.Its most basic value lies in the“general-division-general”structure of the Civil Code,giving full play to the function of tort liability to protect civil rights and better protect the civil rights and interests of civil subjects.
作者 杨立新 YANG Li-xin(The Research Center of Civil and Commercial Juris Prudence of Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期17-30,共14页 Modern Law Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中华人民共和国民法典评注”(18JJD820001)。
关键词 民法典 侵权责任 侵权之债 民事责任 立法价值 Civil Code tort liability tort debt civil liability legislative value
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献194

共引文献549

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部