期刊文献+

算法歧视的类型界分与规制范式重构 被引量:48

The Type Classification of Algorithmic Discrimination and the Reconstruction of Regulatory Paradigm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对算法歧视进行一体化规制的预设失之抽象,个别化规制的探讨则受限于部门法思维,过于宏观与过于微观的视角都存在各自盲点,基于类型界分的规制范式重构尝试探索一条折中路径。承认算法歧视在根源上与传统歧视具有同质性是进行分类的前提,复现型算法歧视、加剧型算法歧视及新增型算法歧视是在比对算法决策与传统决策的基础上实现的类型化整合,以此为基础分析规制歧视的传统范式也显得有的放矢。面对不同类型算法歧视存在的技术难题与法理障碍,进一步细化具体类型中的特殊情形,提炼规制重点,将深化对算法歧视的认知,实现以制衡算法权力为核心的规制范式重构。 The presupposition of integrated regulation of algorithmic discrimination is too abstract,while the exploration of individualized regulation is limited by sectoral law thinking.Both too macroscopic and too microscopic perspectives have their own blind spots,and the reconstruction of the regulatory paradigm based on type classification tries to provide a compromise path.The recognition that algorithmic discrimination is homogeneous at its roots with traditional discrimination is a prerequisite for classification,and that reproducible,aggravated and additive algorithmic discrimination is a typological integration based on a comparison of algorithmic decision making and traditional decision making,which is also a useful basis for analyzing traditional regulatory paradigms for discrimination.In the face of the technical difficulties and jurisprudential obstacles of different types of algorithmic discrimination,further concretizing the specific situations in different types and refining the regulatory priorities will deepen the knowledge of algorithmic discrimination and realize the reconstruction of regulatory paradigm with checks and balances on algorithmic power as the core.
作者 曹博 CAO Bo(Koguan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030)
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期115-126,共12页 Modern Law Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字网络空间的知识产权治理体系研究”(19ZDA164)。
关键词 算法歧视 算法权力 规制范式 algorithmic discrimination algorithmic power regulatory paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献208

共引文献1797

同被引文献905

引证文献48

二级引证文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部