期刊文献+

三级肿瘤专科医院基于疾病诊断相关分组评价指标应用综合指数法对医疗质量的评价研究 被引量:3

Evaluation of comprehensive index method on medical quality based on disease diagnosis related groups evaluation indexs in tertiary tumor specialist hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索三级肿瘤专科医院基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)评价指标应用综合指数法对医疗质量评价的实践及效果,为三级肿瘤专科医院质量管理提供新思路。方法本研究依托上海联众DRGs数据分析平台结合医院病案首页应用综合指数法,从业务能力、学科水平、疑难诊治程度、医疗服务效率及医疗安全5个维度对医院外科系统、内科系统和放疗系统各科室医疗质量进行分析评价。结果 DRGs按综合指数法评价医疗质量排名E、A、B、T、Q、U、Y科室在各诊疗系统内医疗质量好于其他科室,综合得分分别为1.314、1.158、0.966、1.509、1.034、1.609、1.265;D、I、J、S、W科室在各诊疗系统排名靠后,综合得分分别为0.582、0.569、0.432、0.879、0.913,说明科室医疗质量各维度出现不同程度的问题。结论基于DRGs评价指标应用综合指数法能够客观评价各科室医疗质量,准确地反映各科室医疗质量的优势和不足,也可依据评价结果对各科室存在的主要问题制定针对性医疗质量改进措施,提高医、护、患三方满意度。 Objective To explore the practice and effect of evaluation of comprehensive index method on medical quality based on disease diagnosis related groups(DRGs)evaluation indexs,providing new ideas for the quality management of tertiary tumor specialized hospitals.Methods Based on the Shanghai Lianzhong DRGs data analysis platform and the hospital medical record homepage application comprehensive index method,this study analyzed and evaluated the medical quality of hospital surgical system,internal medicine system and radiotherapy system departments from business ability,subject level,difficulty diagnosis and treatment,medical service efficiency and medical safety.Results After DRGs evaluating the medical quality ranking according to the comprehensive index method,the medical quality of the E,A,B,T,Q,U and Y departments in each medical treatment system was better than that of other departments,and the comprehensive scores were 1.314,1.158,0.966,1.509,1.034,1.609,1.265;D,I,J,S and W departments in each diagnosis and treatment system at the bottom of the rankings,the comprehensive scores were 0.582,0.569,0.432,0.879,0.913;there were different levels of problems in the dimensions of medical quality in the department.Conclusion Based on the DRGs evaluation indexs,the comprehensive index method can objectively evaluate the medical quality of each department,accurately reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the medical quality of each department,also formulate targeted medical quality improvement measures based on the evaluation results for the main problems existing in each department and improve the satisfaction of doctors,nurses and patients.
作者 贾慧民 张茜 乔剑楠 王喜艳 Jia Huimin;Zhang Qian;Qiao Jiannan;Wang Xiyan(Medical Administration Division,Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China;Information Management Section,Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China;Party Committee Hospital Office,Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China)
出处 《中国医药》 2021年第8期1250-1253,共4页 China Medicine
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2021D01C391)。
关键词 医疗质量评价 疾病诊断相关分组 综合指数法 Medical quality evaluation Diagnosis related groups Comprehensive index method
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献73

  • 1高丽娟,孙大军.综合指数法与TOPSIS法对医院医疗工作质量的综合评价[J].中国医院统计,2008,15(4):301-303. 被引量:12
  • 2张勇,刘志明,吴彬.用层次分析综合指数法评价医院消毒工作质量[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2005,15(11):1252-1253. 被引量:8
  • 3Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care[J]. The Mil- bank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1966, 44(3): 166-203.
  • 4Campbell S M, Roland M O, Buetow S A. Defining quality of care. Social Science &Medicine[J]. Medicine, 2000, 51(11): 1611-1625.
  • 5田风调.秩和比法的应用[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2002.
  • 6b Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed[J]. The Journal of the AmeriCan Medical Association, 1988, 260(12): 1743- 1748.
  • 7Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 2003.
  • 8Francis HRF. Case mix use in 25 countries:a migration success but international comparisons failure[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2003, 70: 215-219.
  • 9Bala MV,Zarkin GA. Application of cost effectiveness analysis to multiple products: a practical guide[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2002, 8(3): 211 218.
  • 10Kattcy E. Two decades of casemix. Department of Health and Ageing[EB/OL]. [2011-09-14]. http://www. health. gov. au/ int ernet/main/publishing. nsf/Content.

共引文献283

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部