期刊文献+

不同GRACE评分急性心肌梗死患者血清C-反应蛋白、白蛋白、前白蛋白水平变化及临床意义 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)评分急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者血清C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PA)水平变化及临床意义。方法选取2018年11月至2020年10月我院AMI患者109例设为研究组,另选取同期健康体检者109例设为对照组。抽取血液样本经免疫散射比浊法测定PA、CRP水平,经液态酶法测定ALB水平。统计研究组与对照组、研究组不同GRACE评分患者血清CRP、PA、ALB水平,统计分析血清指标与GRACE评分间关联性。结果研究组血清CRP水平高于对照组,PA及ALB水平低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组不同GRACE评分患者血清CRP、PA、ALB水平间存在显著差异(P<0.05),且中危患者血清CRP水平高于低危患者,PA及ALB水平低于低危患者(P<0.05),高危患者血清CRP水平高于中危患者,PA及ALB水平低于中危患者(P<0.05);血清CRP水平与GRACE评分分层间存在正相关关系,血清PA、ALB水平与GRACE评分分层间存在负相关关系(P<0.05)。结论AMI患者血清CRP水平异常增高,PA、ALB水平明显降低,且不同GRACE评分患者各指标水平增高或降低幅度存在显著差异,两者间具有密切关联性。
作者 陈振
出处 《心血管病防治知识(学术版)》 2021年第9期17-19,共3页 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献81

  • 1王魁风,张金盈,厉菁,张力,王小方,杨培灵,陈坡,董加建,赵江涛.探讨血清视黄醇结合蛋白4与冠心病的相关性[J].中国实用医刊,2010,37(4):6-7. 被引量:9
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 5Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.

共引文献689

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部