隔绝、掠夺、规划与共享:野生动物管理模式探讨

Isolation,plunder,planning and sharing:Discussion on wildlife management model

随着生态建设不断取得重大进展,许多野生动物出现在人们的生活之中,甚至其中一部分成为生活在城市中的野生动物。面对具有不同风险的野生动物,生态管理应该正确处理人与野生动物的关系,选择恰当的管理方式。文中旨在探究不同类型的关系伦理与风险感知对野生动物管理模式的影响。本研究采用自填问卷的形式收集资料。通过调节效应与Logit回归分析发现:1)对野生动物风险感知不同,野生动物管理模式具有显著差异。2)对野生动物具有高风险感知时,传统人类中心主义下和生物平等主义下的野生动物管理模式分别为隔绝模式、规划模式。3)对野生动物具有低风险感知时,传统人类中心主义下和生物平等主义下的野生动物管理模式分别为掠夺模式、共享模式。

With the continuous progress of ecological construction,many wild animals appear in people′s lives,and even some of them become wild animals living in cities.Aiming of the wild animals that face different risks,ecological management should correctly deal with the relationship between human and wildlife,and choose the appropriate management mode.To explore the impact of different types of relationship ethics and risk perception on wildlife management model,relative data were collected by self-administered questionnaire.Through the regulatory effect and logit regression analysis,we found that:There are significant differences in wildlife management models with different perceptions of wildlife risk.When there is a high risk perception of wildlife,the traditional anthropocentrism and bioequivalence wildlife management models are isolation model and planning model,respectively.When there is a low risk perception of wildlife,the traditional anthropocentrism and bioequivalence wildlife management models are predatory model and sharing model respectively.