期刊文献+

减轻损失规则的帕累托效率解读与展开 被引量:5

A Pareto-Efficiency Interpretation of Mitigation Rule and the Institution Construction upon its Basis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 帕累托效率说能够给减轻损失规则以最为直接、合理的解释。在违约的情况下,实现债权人的期待利益可能有不同方式,减损规则所认可的是使损失较小进而能减轻债务人负担的方式。以帕累托效率观念为指引,确定非金钱给付和金钱给付的债权人利益何在,并明确债权人不应徒然支出附带费用,不应放任完整利益损失发生或扩大,可对减损规则的具体要求作全面的、体系化的建构。基于帕累托效率观念也可以对减损要求的制约因素作有条理的整理:减损要求不能有害于债权人的期待利益;减损要求应有实效,不能负担过重;选择有利于债务人的方案不是无条件的,债务人仍应对债权人因缺乏资力而未能合理地避免的损失负责。 Pareto-efficiency theory can explain mitigation rules most directly and reasonably.If the obligor breaches,there may be different means of realizing the obligee's expectation interest,mitigation rule approves the one which can reduce loss and then release the obligor's burden.With the guidance of Pareto-efficiency,we should ensure the obligee's interest in non-money and money performance,require the obligee not to expend costs futilely,not to let damage to integrity interest occur or expand.Instead,we can thoroughly and systematically construct the requirements of mitigation rule.The constraining factors of mitigation requirements can also be orderly organized based on the conception of Pareto-efficiency:mitigation requirements should not be detrimental to the obligee's expectation interest;mitigation requirements should be effective and not impose heavy burden on the obligee;adoption of the scheme which benefits the obligor is not unconditional.The obligor should be liable for the loss that the obligee has not mitigated reasonably because of the lack of economic resources.
作者 张金海 ZHANG Jinhai
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第8期75-88,共14页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“民法典背景下违约损害赔偿制度的发展与完善研究”(16BFX154)。
关键词 减轻损失规则 帕累托效率 体系化建构 制约因素 mitigation rule Pareto-efficiency systematic construction constraints
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献71

  • 1张振中.预期违约制度中违约方利益保护问题探析[J].泰州职业技术学院学报,2006,6(2):19-22. 被引量:1
  • 2《俄罗斯民法典》.
  • 3[德]彼得·施菜希特里姆.《联合国国际货物销售合同法公约》评释[M].李慧妮.编译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
  • 4Peter Schlechtriem.Stoll in the "Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG)"[M]. Ox- ford County: Oxford University Press, Second Edition, 1998.
  • 5C.M. Bianca ,M.J. Bonell. Knapp in "Commentary on the International Sales Law: The 1980 Vienna Sales Conven- tion" [M]. Milan: A.Giuffrb Editore,1987.
  • 6Herbert Bernstein ,Joseph Lookofsky.Understanding the CISG in Europe[M]. Boston:Kluwer Law International,1997.
  • 7王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究(第一册)[M].台北:三民书局.1991.
  • 8Payzu v.Sauders(1919) 2K.b.581.
  • 9White and Carter (Councils) Ltd. v. McGregor, [1962] 2 A.C. 428.
  • 10White and Carter (Councils) Ltd. v. McGregor, supra note.

共引文献4

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部