寻衅滋事罪的建构理性与司法经验

The Constructional Rationality and Judicial Experience of the Crime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Troubles

寻衅滋事罪的口袋化一方面源于观念误解,另一方面源于部分司法不当。其根本原因是忽视了或者不合现实地理解本罪的规范保护目的,结果,学界提出废止寻衅滋事罪立法的观点,其司法实践也出现了异化问题。缺乏以社会秩序法益为条件的规范目的的引导,寻衅滋事罪的判断就无目标。本罪的规范目的在于维护社会秩序,其建构的根据是,在行为对身体和财物的损害具有低强度性的场合,行为的多次性、行为对象的复数性和行为场所的公开性等因素加强了行为对社会秩序的负面影响,产生了严重的社会危害性。缺乏个人法益的佐证,寻衅滋事罪的判断就无可靠抓手。社会秩序构成成分复杂,本罪构成要件繁杂,且包括较多规范要件。传统“唯结果导向”的司法经验,异化了本罪规范保护目的并扩大其规制范围。有些扩大化措施必须加以合理限制。只有运用统合方法,才能建立社会秩序与本罪构成的主、客观要件之间的论证联系。

The crime pocketing of picking quarrels and provoking troubles,stems from,on the one hand,the misunderstanding of ideas,and on the other hand,from the improper administration of justice.The fundamental reason is that the purpose of normative protection of this crime is neglected or unrealistically understood.Without the guidance of the normative purpose,which is conditioned by the legal interest of the social order,the judgment of the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles has no target.Its purpose is to maintain social order.The basis for its construction is that behaviors of the multiple,complex behavior object and behavior factors such as the openness strengthen the negative effect of the behavior on the social order in the social occasions where the behavior does damage to the body and property with low intensity.In the absence of evidence of personal legal interest,the judgment of the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles cannot be validated.The composition of social order is complex,and the constitution of this crime is complex,including many normative elements.The traditional“result-oriented”judicial experience dissimilates the protected purpose of this crime and expands its regulated scope.Some expansion measures must be reasonably limited.Only by using the method of integration can the argumentation between the social order and the subjective and objective elements of this crime be established.